About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

R.I.P. Congestion Pricing

by: robert.harding

Mon Apr 07, 2008 at 15:18:54 PM EDT


Liz with the details.

The end.

There will be no vote in the Assembly.

"The conference has decided that they are not prepared to do congestion pricing," said Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver after emerging from behind closed doors where he was closested with members of his Democratic majority. "I think you can speak to the members of the conferene who have made that determination."

"Many of them just don't believe in the concept," the speaker continued. "Many of them think this bill is flawed. So an overwhelming majority of the conference that opposes congestion pricing, and for that reason, the congestion pricing bill did not have anywhere near a majority of the Democratic conference, and will not be on the floor of the Assembly."

From a personal standpoint, Silver said he is "more inclined to admit we must do something about congestion and this is a plan with some work that could work, but it needs amendments."

City Room has more.

Mr. Silver's announcement is a major defeat for the mayor, who had furiously advocated state and city officials for a year and worked to assembly a coalition of business, transportation, environmental and labor groups to support the plan. In recent weeks, the plan had seemed to gain momentum, as the mayor managed to secure support from Gov. David A. Paterson and from the City Council, which on March 31 voted, 30 to 20, to endorse the plan. But up through this afternoon the fate of the plan had seemed uncertain. The Republican leader of the State Senate, Joseph L. Bruno, gave his support the plan, and even Mr. Silver, the Assembly speaker, voiced partial support for it, though adding that he did not believe the members of the Assembly's Democratic majority were convinced.

Saying that this is a huge defeat for Bloomberg is an understatement. He was really pushing this plan and to lose out like this will hurt. But for now, congestion pricing is dead.  

robert.harding :: R.I.P. Congestion Pricing
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not even a public vote (4.00 / 2)
This is a genuinely pathetic use of private meetings.  I'd really expect our legislators to be on the record with this, instead of hiding behind closed doors.

Gutless.


a loss for the public's lungs (4.00 / 3)
not just a loss for Bloomberg but a loss for the city, the environment, the vast majority of New Yorkers who don't drive into Manhattan, bus riders etc etc.

The Drum Major Institute's Executive Director Andrea Batista Schlesinger was on the commission.

Here's her hot off the presses blog post
"Congestion pricing means looking ahead"

In it she writes:

"I got interested in congestion pricing for one simple reason. I sat at Mayor Bloomberg's Earth Day speech last year, and I was moved by the notion - quaint as it is - that government's job is to not just respond but to anticipate the needs of the communities and people it represents. Sadly, some do not share that vision of government. They would rather us not plan for the day, soon approaching, when the realities of climate change will meet the reality of the lives of New Yorkers - and the one million new New Yorkers who will be here. They would rather seem to be the populist heroes of today. And of course there's a reason - because these folks won't be in office when the chickens come home to roost."


www.dmiblog.com

Actually (0.00 / 0)
knowing a lot of people who don't drive into Manhattan, they're universally thrilled they don't have to deal with more people on an already overcrowded system.  

[ Parent ]
And Killed, In Large Part (4.00 / 2)
to deliberate misrepresentations promulgated through the traditional media.  I don't know how many times over the past year -- right up through this morning, even -- I heard opponents to the plan voice their concerns that the proposal would unreasonably drive up costs for small businesses which are reliant on deliveries (either making them themselves or having goods brought to them), since those vehicles "would have to pay for every trip into Manhattan."

This is -- and always has been -- flat out untrue.  The proposal, from its earliest origins as part of last year's PlaNYC 2030 for sustainable growth, through this January's Report to the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission & Recommended Implementation Plan, to the final bill introduced in the legislature, S.7243-B, all clearly indicate:  "A vehicle shall be charged each day for no more than one entry into the congestion pricing zone."  Thus, the complaint of small businesses that the charges would eat up their entire profit margins and/or result in significant price hikes for their products was a complete red herring.

Yet almost never did any reporter bother to point out that the statements made by the plan's opponents were untrue.  I guess bothering with concepts like actual facts is just too bothersome for these reporters and their editors.


Questions no one answered (0.00 / 0)
As someone from Queens, no one answered how would the city's mass transit system handle the amount of new people who would be taking it. There will be no extra A or J trains, which are packed as it is coming out of Queens, but there would be more cars on the C trains, which don't go past Euclid Avenue in Brooklyn. Congestion pricing would bring people to take the subways in neighborhoods like Rockaway, Howard Beach, Ozone Park, Woodhaven, Richmond Hill. Where would these people park their cars? On our residential streets, where parking is ALREADY limited? Instead, they plan on running more E trains, which run every 3 minutes already and are packed. What are they going to do? Run them bumper to bumper?

There's an abandoned LIRR line that would provide an excellent line to Midtown from Rockaway and South Central Queens, but no talk of renovating that and utilizing it.

This whole thing was backwards. First they institute the plan, THEN they update the mass transit system. They promised to update the system with new projects, but we've been promised things before. Excuse us if we have little faith in the MTA.

New York City does not have the same extensive system London has...not yet.  


[ Parent ]
The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Group News Blog
Jason Gooljar
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Take19
The Community Alliance

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice
Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network
>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox