About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

NY-21: Tonko To Announce The Race Is On

by: Soundpolitic

Tue May 20, 2008 at 10:39:46 AM EDT


(This primary is going to be an interesting one. - promoted by phillip anderson)

Longtime Former Assemblyman, Recently Resigned Spitzer Appointee Finally Makes Things Official, Also Scores Early Endorsement

Cross-posted on DailyKos.

When Mike McNulty (D, NY-21) annouced his intentions to retire from Congress after 20 years of service, Paul Tonko's name was instantly tossed about in print and on airwaves as a possible successor.  Several other Capital Region career-politicians had similar rumours circulating this winter, yet Paul Tonko was the only one who neither confirmed nor denied the halo surrounding the possibility of his candidacy.

Today, Paul Tonko will officially annouce that, yes, he is running for Congress.  He will do so tonight at the Albany Labor Temple at 5:30.  In doing so, he joins seven other Democrats who have already officially annouced their candidacy, and with whom he debated with a week ago while still an unofficial candidate.

Soundpolitic :: NY-21: Tonko To Announce The Race Is On
Capital News 9 introduces the story in a tell-tale manner:

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Paul Tonko makes no secret about it. He's had his eye on the 21st Congressional seat nearly as long as others have had their eyes on him.
Now the tenth candidate to announce, while one has already dropped out, Tonko says he made the decision to run back in April when he resigned from NYSERDA.
Tonko denied interest in the position to focus on the state budget and then help his long time colleague, David Patterson, assume the role of governor. He says it was only after he stepped down from his state role that he was finally able to focus on this campaign.  Emphasis added

As mentioned above, the press has had thier eye on Paul Tonko since the October 2007 announcement that Mike McNulty would retire.  In following the race since February, I have made constant note that rumors of Paul Tonko's possible candidacy would often trump actual movement by annouced candidates like Phil Steck, Darius Shahinfar, and Lester Freeman in the mainstream news media.  Still, Tonko would not confirm or deny, until now, that he was indeed making a run all this time.

In fact, it was as early as last week's debate where one of Tonko's surrogates told me, insisting that things remain off the record, that he was running but that an official annoucement would come in a matter of days.  Today, it appears they've held true, just barely meeting the deadline so it didn't become a matter of a week or more again.

Some observors make note that this is a good thing and that this candidacy rockets him up to the top of the pack.  It's difficult not to argue with this; Tonko has a quarter-century's worth of good name recognition in the district and a quarter-century's worth of experience working for the people.  Regardless of whether one agrees of disagrees with his policies or performance, that is a tough hurdle for the other seven candidates to overcome, and it is impossible not to respect Tonko's tenure as a public servant.

I make the comparison that if this were the Presidential Primary, then Tonko's official announcement is an event akin to Al Gore's hypothetical entry into the national race.  It is that big of a deal to some voters in NY-21.  People have indeed been waiting for this, and it completely changes the race: there is no denying internally or publicly that Tonko is the name to beat in this race.

All but proving this to be a fact, the endorsements for Paul Tonko are already rolling in.  The Daily News Daily Politics blog reports today that CWA is supporting Tonko's candicay.  The union has close connections to New York's Working Families Party, another body whose endorsement of any candidate in this primary is expected to shake things up in the future.

Up until this point, however, the future and speculation about it is what the Tonko campaign has been about in the press.  That changes today when he makes things official, but in the past, well-documented here on the blogosphere, every little move by Tonko has been covered when the biggest movement, mostly by Phil Steck, the first candidate to annouce, has been ignored.  

Back when candidate Paul Tonko was registering domain names and Tracey Brooks was cybersquatting them, that got coverage instead of Phil Steck's racking up endorsements from local elected officials closest to the community.  The race has been covered in this unbalanced manner since the beginning, giving lesser known but more youthful and progressive candidates a much higher hurdle than I believe to be appropriate no matter how well-liked or qualified Paul Tonko is.

Also from the Capital News 9 report:

In an exclusive interview, Tonko told us much of his campaign strategy will focus on his experience in the state legislature as well as his expertise on energy issues, something that sets him apart from the seven other democrats in the race and will lead to higher profile assignments in Washington.
::
At this point, some would say he's the most recognizable candidate in the race.
Tonko says with the prolonged presidential primary, some voters could be exhausted by the political process and looking for a face they know and trust.

While his assessment is correct and his strategy sound and predictable, I can't help but think of how complicit the press has been in making sure people know about Tonko before his official announcement while not letting people know who else has officially annouced.  And while I don't doubt Paul Tonko could serve his constituents well in Congress, we have been done a great disservice by the mainstream media up until this point.  It gives me no pleasure to predict that biased coverage towards Tonko will continue and become more unfair to other annouced candidates as this race progresses, and it begs the question:

If Paul Tonko wins this primary and goes on to win the general (as the winner most certainly will), who will be responsible for the victory: Tonko for having run on his experience and energy expertise, or the press for quite simply shutting everybody else out?

One thing that is not in question anymore is how much harder each other other seven campaign will be working to defeat such a tough opponent.  And that we can at least adhere to the fact that when so many Democrats compete in a primary, we are certain to end up with the the best general election candidate.

Still, others have not been so quick to jump on board the Tonko ship.  Times Union columnist Fred LeBrun had knighted Tonko "Hamlet On The Mohawk" last month.  He identified a possible problem of Tonko's late entry, citing that Tracey Brooks, the only woman in the race had already moved to front-runner status.  

Yet Phil Steck has spent the most time campaigning in this race, and now that the press is done covering rumors of Tonko's annoucement as it becomes reality, they may begin to find that Phil Steck has been campaigning harder than they anticipated.  From this week's Troy Record online Talespin:

Congressional candidate Phil Steck, an Albany County legislator, got the endorsement of four of the six Democrats on the Troy City Council last week - Councilmen Ken Zalewski, John Brown, Gary Galuski and Peter Ryan.

It's a pretty big deal given the pundits and operatives think the race to replace Rep. Michael McNulty, who decided not to run for an 11th term representing the 21st Congressional District in Washington, will be won or lost in Rensselaer County.

Steck has built many a bridge in Albany County, where nearly half of the more than 428,000 voters in the district live and the all-but-announced candidate, former Assemblyman Paul Tonko, hails from the western portion of the district where there is a lot of land but relatively few voters.

So, that leaves Rensselaer County and its more than 61,000 registered voters who are pretty much expected to be up for grabs.

If this kind of coverage beings to fill the void of rumors about Tonko after he places himself on the same official footing as the other seven candidates, then perhaps he too will regret having entered the race late.  The press may soon discover that the candidate running the strongest was the first to announce, not the last to hit the ground running.

Soundpolitic Blogger's Note
At the very least, the media should report as though the race is still extrememly wide-open, with Tonko's entry as a final game-changer before nominating petitions start circulating.  After covering this race since the beginning and having most recently seen all eight candidates make their case, including Mr. Tonko, I can say that he will be on the ballot, as will Ms. Brooks, Mr. Shahinfar, and Mr. Steck.

Paul Tonko becomes the name to beat in this primary, yet that challenge is being taken up by strong campaigners, proven (Brooks, Freeman) and unwisely discounted (Shahinfar, Steck)

I would not discount John Aretakis, Craig Burridge, or Lester Freeman at this point either, for reasons of both money resources for the first two, and for a dedication to drawn out primary battles for Mr. Freeman.  I do not expect Arthur Welser, "Citizen for Congress" to make the ballot, but please visit his...interesting website anyway.
I encourage those who wish to know the most there is to know about all eight candidates to check out my complete question by question coverage of last week's definitive debate.  Fellow blogger Albany Layman over at Demoracy In Albany also has the full scoop not found in the commercial establishments.
And despite all my railing on Tonko, it is the media's coverage that I am most dissapointed with, not Paul Tonko or his record.  His candidacy is part of what makes the Democratic primary for Congress in NY-21 one of the most exciting races in 2008 - a year as full as excitement for Democratic politics as never before.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tip Jar and Full Disclosure (4.00 / 1)
I am a Steck for Congress volunteer because Phil Steck is the candidate that has me most excited about the race.

Great Post again Soundpolitic! (4.00 / 1)
and thanks for staying all over this race for the community! You are to this race what Jonah is in NY13!

[ Parent ]
Thanks to you too! (0.00 / 0)
New York's primary season is spurring excitement all over the state.  It really hits home if it's your home district, too.  My Senate District is having a primary this year, too, so expect me to be on that as well.  The State Senate gets even less coverage but they are just as important.  Peace!

[ Parent ]
Few Comments (4.00 / 1)
First, congrats on your degree SoundPolitic.  I believe you graduated with an AAS in Paralegal Studies with honors if I heard correctly, so before getting back to the 21st, I wanted to congratulate you on that accomplishment.

"In fact, it was as early as last week's debate where one of Tonko's surrogates told me, insisting that things remain off the record, that he was running but that an official annoucement would come in a matter of days. Today, it appears they've held true, just barely meeting the deadline so it didn't become a matter of a week or more again."

"Even after the debate yesterday when I asked Tonko and one of his surrogates if he was officially in, the answer was no, not yet, any day now, couple days, but keep it off the record."

If people are speaking to you off the record, it shows a serious lack of journalistic integrity to turn around and post it in your blog.  If you want to be taken as a serious news source, you can't abuse the role.  I still have my doubts about who said it and whether it was a surrogate or merely a supporter and you are overstating their relationship (even if accidentally). I know Paul and I know most of his campaign team.  None of them would have said this off the record since Paul said it publicly and on camera before the event and several times.  

It would have been improper for him to have actually announced and campaigned before leaving his position with NYSERDA.  He did the right thing and got the agency in order, worked through the budget, and helped the Governor before leaving NYSERDA.  He said that he was in the race at several events since he resigned from NYSERDA, he just was putting together his official announcement.  I am not calling you a liar (please don't take this as a personal attack), but I will say there is no way this is in proper context and implying that something was being hidden from the public is extremely inaccurate and unfair.   Paul has been open and on the record that he has been running since he resigned.  Before that, he had interest but fulfilled his responsibilities despite what it may cost his campaign.  That's called putting integrity over ambition and should be respected, not attacked and implied it was underhanded.

"Steck has built many a bridge in Albany County, where nearly half of the more than 428,000 voters in the district live and the all-but-announced candidate, former Assemblyman Paul Tonko, hails from the western portion of the district where there is a lot of land but relatively few voters"

Paul has some pretty big bridges in Albany County too since on day one he was endorsed by
County Executive Mike Breslin
Assembly Democratic Majority Leader Ron Canestrati
Albany City Council President Shawn Morris
Albany County Legislative Majority Leader and Co-Chairman of the County Democratic Committee Frank Commisso
along with a host of other Albany County Democratic officials.  This is only day one.  

Paul also has the backing of
Susan Savage, Chair of the Schenectady County Legislature
Brian Quail, Chairman of the Schenectady County Democratic Party
Schoharie Democratic County Chairman Cliff Hay
Schenectady Mayor Brian Stratton
Schenectady County Legislature Vice Chairwoman Judy Dagostino
Former Schenectady Mayor and Current County Legislator Karen Johnson
Schenectady County Legislature Majority Leader Gary Hughes
Schenectady County Legislator Tony Jasenski
Niskayuna Town Supervisor Joe Landry
Former Root Town Supervisor Brian Cechnicki
Schenectady City Councilman Mark Blanchfield
Niskayuna Democratic Chairwoman Ellen Malkis
City of Schenectady Democratic Chairman Dick Naylor
Glenville Town Chairman Joe McQueen
Rotterdam Democratic Town Chairman Tony Cevera
Former Assemblywoman and Secretary of State Gail Schaffer
This is day one.  I expect at least a dozen more Albany, Schenectady, and Montgomery County endorsements in the next few days.

In addition, CWA and the Letter Carriers have both endorsed Tonko.  I expect several more announcements within the coming weeks.  Tonko has a long and great relationship with labor to draw on.  Several other unions were at the announcement but I don't believe have officially endorsed.

"At the very least, the media should report as though the race is still extrememly wide-open, with Tonko's entry as a final game-changer before nominating petitions start circulating. After covering this race since the beginning and having most recently seen all eight candidates make their case, including Mr. Tonko, I can say that he will be on the ballot, as will Ms. Brooks, Mr. Shahinfar, and Mr. Steck."

"Paul Tonko becomes the name to beat in this primary, yet that challenge is being taken up by strong campaigners, proven (Brooks, Freeman) and unwisely discounted (Shahinfar, Steck)"

You admit that Tonko is the name to beat but then claim it must be covered as wide-open.  Tonko is obviously the front-runner and covering it any other way would simply be inaccurate.  Also, Freeman isn't a proven campaigner, he has never won.  He has simply proven he will continually keep running.  His campaign thus far is only known for its heckling of other candidates and damaging other people's signs.  I agree with the Brooks, Shahinfar, and Steck comment.  I must say, after meeting Darius, were Paul not in the race I'd be volunteering for him.

"And despite all my railing on Tonko, it is the media's coverage that I am most dissapointed with, not Paul Tonko or his record."

Thank you for clarifying this important point.  I agree I want to see more coverage of the candidates as a general democratic principle.  I do think you should be careful going forward not to blame the media for just stating the fact that Tonko is the frontrunner.

"Back when candidate Paul Tonko was registering domain names and Tracey Brooks was cybersquatting them,"

I assumed you had already printed a retraction of this earlier post since it came out that Paul Tonko DID NOT hire a DC firm to register domain names, it was Tracey Brooks that did it to block the other candidates.  This is a very important point and you need to be careful referencing back to inaccurate articles.  While the original mistake was not yours, you have a responsibility not to refer back to the mistaken article and to put up a retraction.  

"Phil Steck's racking up endorsements from local elected officials closest to the community."

When is Phil Steck going to reject the endorsement of Tom DiMezza? DiMezza endorses and campaigns for extreme-right-wing Republicans, calls for selling the public nursing home which endangers the elderly of Montgomery County, and refused to work with any of his colleagues to the point that one, the Democratic County Chair, called him a "bully."  


I do agree (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for the congrats.  And your line about Freeman continuing to run made me laugh.

Just to be clear on a few things, especially the whole off the record business.  I'm not a professional journalist, just a guy who volunteers.  When politicians or their people talk to the press and say "keep this off the record" it's usually to duck and cover from something.  Not with me.  Because I'm interested in the whole story.  But to reassure you, it is not a ploy to just make something up.  I shook Paul Tonko's hand, asked him about an interview, and he directed me to a young fellow in a suit who told me exactly what I blogged earlier.  I did not name him, and that was all.

Regarding his announcement, I do see a small bit of innapropriateness in the timing.  I understand that we have ethics laws that prevented Tonko from running while still at the head of NYSERDA.  But he resigned from that position a month ago.  It's clear now he's been campaigning, or at least preparing for the campaign, since the day he left, by his own words.  So why didn't he just make part of his resignation announcement his official announcement to run for Congress?  These two issues together bring to light the practices of what I see to be a career politician who has gotten used to telling interviewers and the press one thing and the public another.

Don't fail me, though: when I say career politician, it's been a good, long, respectable career.  It's still the way this race is being covered that is my main point of concern.  It's my own personal view that either Tonko, Steck, or Shahinfar would make excellent Congressman.  But it's only Tonko getting coverage.  His record and name-recognition are so good, he doesn't need that kind of slant.  Candidates like Phil Steck and Darius Shahinfar, who are stronger on some issues to voters who have gotten to know them despite the media's blackout, are also younger, and stand to reach greater heights in the Congress's seniority system.  Yet the press still has been "Bonko for Tonko" since day one, even reporting that he was registering domain names (when in fact, they were really being registered by Tracey Brooks, but the press has yet to make that correction, thanks for pointing that out.)

So even though Tonko is the name to beat (I'd be a political fool not to say so) we must remember that sometimes the name to beat gets beaten.  Tonko's early swell of support is overwhelming, and a testament to his illustrious career.  But in another primary, we had an early groundswell of support for our junior Senator, who is now being locked out by somebody younger, with slightly more progressive ideas, and a different kind of campaign.  I wish all the best for Mr. Tonko, but will continue hoping that the same pattern repeats itself here and we get a younger candidate who can rise farther in Congress, still hit the ground running, and whose progressive principles are unshakable.


[ Parent ]
Old Saying (0.00 / 0)
There is an old saying that before you tell me what you want to do, tell me what you have done.  I still don't know what Steck has done, despite hearing what he wants to do.  

I know you hate me pointing this out, but he wasn't even able to get the Albany County Legislature to pass an ant-war resolution.  What has he accomplished besides the win this year, which I have pointed out had a lot to do with circumstance and moderate candidates?  If we are to judge Steck by his tenure as Colonie Chair, then shouldn't he also be judged by the huge deficit the Republicans ran up without him being able to elect even a single Democrat until this year?  He didn't even provide a full field of Democratic candidates to challenge for every seat, therefore voters didn't even have a full choice.  Isn't that the definition of failing as a town chair when you don't provide an opposition?

If we are to judge him by this campaign, I must say I am sadly disappointed.  His accepting and promoting the endorsement of Tom DiMezza shows he is out of touch with the western portion of the district and isn't the progressive party builder he claims to be.  No progressive Democrat would accept the endorsement of someone who helped elect a right-wing conservative Republican.  DiMezza helped elect George Amedore through outright lying about and attacking a Democratic candidate.  DiMezza is known by his own Democratic colleagues as a "bully."  Phil Steck must reject this endorsement.

Also, I am disappointed by the fact that Steck is resorting to Karl Rove type tactics by trying to blame Paul Tonko for George Bush's energy crisis.  Paul has a record of great work on energy including testifying in congress for solutions.  Paul has sponsored tax cuts on electricity and done major work.  For Phil Steck to attack Paul for high energy costs foolish and misleading.  Did Paul somehow cause us to invade Iraq or make the federal government ignore the coming crisis?  Paul was the voice in the wilderness telling the Congress this was coming and how to prevent it.  This is why we need him there changing things and fixing the damage done by George Bush.  Energy policy can't be done state by state.  Energy travels from state to state and if one sets high environmental standards (like New York) it is punished by the system because energy companies go to other states and charge New Yorkers more.  We need federal solutions.  We need real policy change.  What we don't need is to start trying to tie other progressive Democrats to George Bush's failing record.  It's wrong.  Voters deserve a discussion of the issues, not this kind of Rove tactics.

"Just to be clear on a few things, especially the whole off the record business.  I'm not a professional journalist, just a guy who volunteers.  When politicians or their people talk to the press and say "keep this off the record" it's usually to duck and cover from something.  Not with me.  Because I'm interested in the whole story.  But to reassure you, it is not a ploy to just make something up.  I shook Paul Tonko's hand, asked him about an interview, and he directed me to a young fellow in a suit who told me exactly what I blogged earlier."

"But he resigned from that position a month ago.  It's clear now he's been campaigning, or at least preparing for the campaign, since the day he left, by his own words.  So why didn't he just make part of his resignation announcement his official announcement to run for Congress?  These two issues together bring to light the practices of what I see to be a career politician who has gotten used to telling interviewers and the press one thing and the public another."

Paul never told the press one thing and the public another.  He was very open with his intentions to run from the moment he resigned, including giving a public speech on his plans to run a couple weeks ago in Schenectady and publicly stating it at both the State Committee meeting and during the Albany interviews.  Lets not get confused here, Paul never said he wasn't running, he just took his time to put together a public kickoff.  Paul has never been anything less than 100% honest with the public.

As for you not being a professional. If you are presenting yourself as a journalist by saying you want an interview for your blog and post on your blog coverage of the race with a Mainstream Media critique, you have a responsibility to follow journalistic protocols.  Something being on or off the record isn't a way to duck in cover most of the times, its often an important way to give tips to the media or provide context that would otherwise not be possible.  It provides an important tool to journalism and its abuse is bad for democracy.


[ Parent ]
Good words (0.00 / 0)
One thing is for sure: with these two very strong candidates in the race, the arguments for both to go to Congress will be tough.  My diary on the follow-up to Tonko's announcement and Steck's show of strength at the Albany County Democratic Committee makes this clear.

I'd also like to make clear that the arguments over Tonko's announcement are done with and the focus now moves on to people's records.  While I wouldn't hold Tonko accountable for George Bush's energy crisis (just as I wouldn't hold Steck responsible for a century of Republican mismanagement, or for Tom DiMezza's actions not connected to the Steck campaign) I believe that Steck's scrutiny of Tonko's lengthly record is warranted.  With so long a record, he's had time to prove himself; it's the old axiom that long-serving Senators have tough times running for President because their records are so long and the changes that have been made appear slower given their many years in power alongside the growth of many unsolved problems.  

I don't think describing Phil's tactics as akin to Karl Rove's is warranted at all.  That's the kind of accusation that turns a heated primary too hot.  Phil Steck is merely scrutinizing the record of his opponent in a strong manner, similar to the scrutiny you are showing Steck.  That is to be expected in a race like this, and it's what makes it exciting and pushes our candidates to make their best case, and represent us better in the end.  Tonko is sure to make use of the same tactics, which are tough scrutiny and not Rovian misrepresentation, against Phil should he prove to be as strong a campaigner.  Of that, I'll have no doubt; NY-21 continues to be a race to watch, and so far none of the candidates have given us anything to turn away from in disgust...except perhaps Tracey Brooks.

Also, I like being able to say stuff like that as an amatuer reporter.  Here, I can give my own analysis, and give the whole truth.  Part of that is also a personal referendum, which you can agree or disagree with, on the way professional journalists treat things like tips, leaks, and "off the record" instructions.  It's just one way the blogosphere is changing the way people get their news, and part of the avenue; I applaud bloggers who hold themselves to a more traditional standard, yet I'm glad that an audience is emerging for something more progressive while remaining ethical integrity (at least I hope that's what I'm doing here!)

Thanks for the comments...I hope you don't mind me using your list of Tonko's elected supporters in my most recent coverage; I'm glad someone got the scoop on this list, so thanks for that again too!


[ Parent ]
The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Group News Blog
Jason Gooljar
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Take19
The Community Alliance

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice
Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network
>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox