| Not only is this a discussion of who could rise to prominence, but I'd also like to analyze who should become an upstate leader. I'll look at legislative leaders only, as replacements in the three main Executive offices would take an exacerbating primary effort in 2010 and would hurt the party and the state. My focus is on several factors:
Representing Upstate : We want to find an experienced legislator from some part of the region to act as a key representative for the entirety of Upstate New York.
Progressive Leadership : We want that leader to be a solid Progressive, not just a Democrat.
Understanding of the Issues : We want a leader who have demonstrated experience and knowledge about revitalization efforts and who can act as both a policy powerhouse and an effective leader in pushing those proposals forward.
So who would be an appropriate choice?
Assembly
Sam Hoyt : Robert will be interviewing Assemblyman Hoyt in the near future and I'll be interested to read that transcript. Assemblyman Hoyt part of the Buffalo area and is an experienced legislator. He is leading the fight to reform Industrial Development Agencies (see here . He also explicitly defines himself as a progressive . I believe Assemblyman Hoyt represents all of the characteristics we need in an upstate leader; progressive, solid experience, progressive framing, and representing Western New York. As I've mentioned before, the East/West of the Hudson divide is often forgotten in our discussion of the state. Picking a leader from the Albany area might be a natural tendency (like Ron Canestrari) but I believe a Western or Central New Yorker would better represent the interests of the upstate urban economy.
Senate
David Valesky : It's a bit harder to find an upstate Democratic Senator with new leadership potential, let alone a progressive one, but I think David Valesky is the closest to a match. Valesky represents the suburbs of Syracuse and won a nailbiter in 2004. He has been fully embraced and supported by the Working Families Party, although he seems more hesitant to call himself an outright progressive. Valesky is involved in the Surburban Democratic Caucus and has worked on a few development issues as well. Valesky is much more involved in agricultural issues, a key way to reach out to rural constituencies.
So what do you think? Who can take the reigns as upstate leaders in the Legislature? |