About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

NY-21: The Soundpolitic Voter's Guide

by: Soundpolitic

Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 22:21:28 PM EDT


Eight months ago, I started to blog on DailyKos and The Albany Project on the Democratic Primary for Congress in New York's 21st Congressional District.  It was set off by a November 2007 announcement that current Representative Mike McNulty would retire after 20 years of service.

I had a hunch instantly that Rep. McNulty's decision not to make any endorsement for a possible successor that a wide-open primary would ensue, and also figured it would be very heavily contested and highly competitive.  Looking at the history of the district, I also realized that no primary campaign for Congress of the type that has indeed developed had taken place in at least half a century.

And I also figured that the mainstream media would be strapped or resources in covering the nuances that would appear between the many candidates, and I decided to start blogging because this is a historic race and I felt I could provide more information to voters than other outlets had space for.

Currently, the five Democratic candidates are Tracey Brooks, Darius Shahinfar, Phil Steck, Joseph P. Sullivan, and Paul Tonko.  While the mainstream media has indeed covered the race and the candidates have sent out a slew of mailers and robocalls, the space devoted and the limited resources of both outlets have still left many voters undecided and unsure of what the differences between these five candidates are with only hours to go before polls open on Primary Day, September 9th.

Well, there are major differences between these candidates.  And in order to make an informed choice, people need more information to supplement what has been available in the mainstream media and the paid communications of the campaigns.  After spending the past eight months blogging, I have interviewed the four of the five major candidates and attended the most definitive debates between them.   This also includes weekly news-wraps summarizing press releases sent to me by all the campaigns, most of which were not covered in manstream media outlets, as well as editorial pieces in support of one particular candidate.

For the purpose of providing that information as the polls get closer to opening, I link to the all the interviews and the major debates so that readers can learn more about the candidates in their own words, as well as make my own endorsements of candidates in the most historic primary ever to take place in the Capital Region in this final blog on New York's 21st Congressional District.

Just click "There's more..." for the most comprehensive and informative coverage of the race available.

Soundpolitic :: NY-21: The Soundpolitic Voter's Guide
The Soundpolitic Interviews

Interview with Tracey Brooks

Interview with Darius Shahinfar

Interview with Phil Steck

Interview with Paul Tonko

Blogger's Note:  No interview was conducted for Joseph P. Sullivan, who entered the race as a "conservative" Democrat and vowed to spend less than $1,000 on the race.  I give him credit for making the ballot, but this is a progressive blog dedicated to covering progressive Democrats who take the campaign seriously.  Sullivan's behavior in the following debates, as well as his insistence on referring to himself in super-hero terms has lead to me to conclude that he is not a serious candidate, and even bloggers have limited time and space to spend on candidates.

The Soundpolitic Debates

The final forum between these four major candidates occurred August 24, 2008, and instead of simply providing snapshot covered, I determined that the questions and answers were so throrough and comprehensive that a full trasncript was warranted.  Here it is in it's entirety in seven parts:

Final Forum, Part I:  Candidates' Opening Statements

Final Forum, Part II:  Foreign Policy Debate

Final Forum, Part III: Domestic Policy Debate

Final Forum, Part IV:  Candidates' Questions to One Another

Final Forum, Part V:  Energy Policy Debate

Final Forum, Part VI:  Miscellaneous Issues Debate

Final Forum, Part VII:  Candidates' Closing Statements

In addition, I attended three other debates, some of which include a Republican Primary candidate here and there, some candidates that have since withdrawn form the race, and one of which dealt entirely with health care.

Democratic Candidates' Heatlh Care Debate

Five Democratic and Two Republican Candidates Debate

Eight Democrats Debate

Soundpolitic's Candidate Endorsements

If you search back through my own diary page by clicking Soundpolitic wherever it apears in blue, you can sift through my previous blogs in which I offer up my opinions on the race, as well as several weekly wraps in my "State of the Race" series.  There, it will become clear as to which candidate I support, which candidates I respect, and which candidates I am opposed to.  To summarize, here are my endorsements of each candidate:

Endorsed Candidate: Phil Steck

I have spent several days on the ground in support of Phil Steck's campaign for Congress between the months of March and July.  He was the first candidate to get back to me, and I didn't know much about it; at first, his candidacy seemed unlikely to me, as he is currently an Albany County Legislator, and most members of the New York Congressional delegation are former members of the state legislature.

But Phil Steck's adamant progressivism on issues like the War in Iraq (he spoke out against it on day one) universal single-payer health care (he's been working on it for years) and his success as an attorney (he has won many a civil rights case with a strong sense of justice) attracted me to volunteer for his underdog campaign.  He also has far more extensive plans to stimuatle the economy and save the environment with an green jobs and alternative energy program, has a much more reasoned and thorough foreign policy than his opponents, and was the only candidate to announce a plan to address urban blight.  He also comes from the suburbs, making him uniquely qualified to address the probelm of suburan sprawl, as well as confirming the shift in Democratic power from the cities to the suburbs, as well as rural areas.  And his run quickly showed itself to be a strong one, and he has knocked on more doors than any other candidate in the race, as well as sent out the strongest mailers and advertisements.  And his strong ties to the community shows in the speed in which he obtained the largest number of endorsements from local elected officials, those who are closest to our communities, and showed that he could stand up to the notorious Albany County Democratic machine, a holdover from the conservative Corning Era, by winning the Albany County Democratic Committee's endorsement, a testament to his coalition building skills.

He has joined Barack Obama, who inspired to me to become involved in politics this year in the first place, in rejecting donations from lobbyists and PACs, and like Obama, has the highest percentage of donations from regular individuals from within the district, showing himself to be the change that we wish to see in Washington.  And he has shown clearly his knack for not backing down on his positions, as well as his "I won't think twice" attitude about standing up to members of his own party.

Phil Steck is exactly the kind of candidate that every Congressional District needs, and he is poised to win after being virtually shunned in the beginning by the mainstream media, proving that if you work hard and stand firm in your principles, you can bring about change in a big way.  I proudly endorse Phil Steck for Congress and encourage you to pull the lever for him on September 9th and November 4th.

Respected Candidates:  Darius Shahinfar and Paul Tonko

In order of preference, I highly respect candidates Darius Shahinfar and Paul Tonko.  Should either one win on Tuesday's primary, I will gladly switch from being a Steck volunteer to being a Darius or Tonko volunteer, and would gladly vote for them in the General Election.

Darius Shahinfar is my second choice because of my affinity for underdogs who raise themselves to the top tier against all odds.  Many assumed he would not even make the ballot.  But he made it, and he has plenty of experience in all three branches of government, most recently and notably as a regional representative in Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand's office.  With that experience, he would slide into his own Congressional office ready to get to work, and he'd do the job well.  He has demonstrated sincerity in his words, has surrounded himself with staff and volunteers that are every bit as respectful and talented as the Steck campaign, and is even talking about a few issues that other candidates haven't really touched on, most notably federal funding for public schools as opposed to local property taxes, which is a big issue for me personally.  Yet Darius is a new name in the district, so I don't believe his chances of winning are too great.  In the event he does not win, I sincerely hope we see his signs again for another office and makes it that time around.  In the event that he does, my respect for him will have grown exponentially and an dark horse will have set off a major upset, and while I still like Phil Steck better, that would be rather exciting indeed.

Paul Tonko is my middle-of-the-road candidate.  He has a long career in public service, including 23 years in the Assembly.  He talks about energy, energy, and energy, and I believe one of the biggest issues that we need to solve in this country is our looming energy crisis.  Because if you think things are bad now, just wait another couple of years if changes are not made.  However, the State Assembly experience is a double-edged sword.  As a former Assembly intern, I know how things work in there, and they do not work for the benefit of the constituents in New York State.  While Paul Tonko casts himself as the exception to the rule, I'm nonetheless skeptical that perhaps a lot of experience in this realm is too much experience.  Furthermore, his excuse for accepting money from lobbyists, special interests, and PACs (the worst of which is Alfonse D'Amato's AmericaPAC) of having to play with the system in order to keep up the good work he claims to have accomplished, even if he has accomplished much, just doesn't fit my attitude that people can be the change they wish to be.  I will vote for Paul Tonko if he wins the Primary so I can keep the 21st represented by a Democrat, but I honestly prefer that he take second place, even if he has been the favorite to win since well before his announcement.

Opposed Candidates:  Joseph P. Sullivan and Tracey Brooks

Joseph P. Sullivan is not a serious candidate whatsoever.  Not only is he rude to voters, he is not competitive as far as grass roots efforts or funding goes, and I truly believe he has no chance at winning any election at any point.  He is also the former chairman of the Albany Republicans and has conservative positions that are absolutely appalling:  his catchphrase has been "The troops aren't coming home..get over it!"  and at one of the debates, his obvious racisim and bigotry was clear and present.  He's also very old and crotchety, and that is not the type of person who is fit to govern.  It's impossible for me as a progressive Democrat to vote for him.  But if for some strange reason all the voting machine screw up beyond legal remedy and he does go to Congress, he'll at least be hilariously funny to the last drop of Tullamore Dew Irish Whiskey, which he claims to drink an entire bottle of each week.  And I wouldn't mind getting together for a drink with him after this whole joke candidacy of his is over.

Tracey Brooks has raised the most money in the race, is the only woman in the race, and most recently worked for failed Presidential candidate Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.  But those are not the reasons she is on the bottom of my list of endorsements.   From the very beginning, her candidacy has been gender-based and exploitative of women, and it's become more and more transparent ever since.  Her faceless cardboard men in her television advertisements and mailers are not only insulting, but the sheer amount of paid advertising she's flooded voters with suggests that she believes she can buy her way into Congress and ride the wave of the Clinton name, which I don't hold very high in the first place.  

Furthermore, she was registered Republican right up until the middle of George W. Bush's first term in office, yet claimed in her interview with me that it was the Newt Gingrich Congress that made her want to run for Congress as a progressive.  To that I say: yeah right.  Not only that, but she has consistently lied throughout her campaign, claiming the highest number of individual donors when in fact most of her money is bundled up in PACs.  She also has very close connections to Republican lobbyists and special interests.  One of her Republcian maxed-out donors was even arrested for stealing her opponents signs not off of rights-of-way, but off the private property of citizens in the 21st Congressional District.  While she says, like any slick poltician would, that she didn't condone this, the action still reflects on her candidacy.  

I also don't like the way she communicates like a transparent politician: after three debates and a long interview and the most mailers and poorly produced television advertisements, it's clear to me that she just says the same old stuff over and over and over again, and quite frankly, I'm sick of politicians like that, and I'm sick of hearing Tracey speak, getting her mailers, and seeing her ads.  Finally, while all the other campaigns have expressed their gratitude for the work I've done on these blogs, her campaign spokesman, Kyle Kotary, has consistently sent me long e-mails criticizing my work, calling me names, and bullying me, even after assuring me he would not engage in comments on my postings here.  As any person is judged by the company one keeps, that reflects upon Brooks as well.  

These are the reasons why I can never in any way support a Tracey Brooks candidacy no matter what office she seeks or what political party she decides to re-register with in order to buy it to satisfy her quest for power at all costs.  I believe we are in big trouble is she ends up going to Washington.  If by some chance Brooks wins the primary election, the voters of the 21st District will be blessed that Phil Steck and Paul Tonko will be running on the Independence and Working Families Party lines so that they still have the opportunity to send a truthful, experienced, and hard-working progressive to Congress in 2008.

Soundolitic Blogger's Note

This concludes my coverage of the historic Democratic Primary for Congress in New York's 21st Congressional District.  I thank everybody for reading through my work, the Albany Project for promoting so many of my diaries on the subject and granting me front-page status as a result.  And I urge you all to not just take my word for it and visit the candidates websites up top, and maybe call up their campaign to ask any questions you may still have if you are still undecided....if they don't call you first, that is!  I am currently focusing my increased volunteer and blogging efforts in support of another primary candidate in the district, David Weiss for State Senate 46th District, but I'll never forget the NY-21 primary campaign as I've learned so much from all the candidates and all the good readers and posters here on The Albany Project and DailyKos.

The primary is Tuesday, September 9th.  Polls are open from 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm. May the best man win.  Peace,

Colin Abele
Berne, NY

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tip Jar & Cross-Posts (4.00 / 4)
Tips for real voter guides.

Cross-posted on DailyKos and Democracy In Albany.


While I Respectfully Disagree... (4.00 / 2)
With your choice of candidate - I commend your efforts to cover this race. It really is important for the voters of the 21st CD to take notice of the embarrassing lack of coverage with regards to this congressional race.

I'm confident that more publicized and well-moderated debates, as well as profile coverage of the candidates in the local papers(beyond the token piece in the TU) would have proven for a more educated polity.

Nice work, good luck. Particularly with the 43rd Senate Primary.

Vote Tuesday folks, polls are open noon to 9! Be sure to check the Albany County BOE website to make sure your election site is still the same! (Then come on out and vote for Paul Tonko for Congress!!)


[ Parent ]
BOE (4.00 / 1)
Thanks, PineHills.  Y'know, I've been telling the voters with Tonko signs to vote for two nationally recognized energy experts, and it seems to be working out great :-)

On the BOE, I canvassed a couple poll workers who have tons of concerns about the way elections are going down nowadays.  We've got a real problem with voting machines in this country.  I wish all the candidates for Congress had made this as big an issue as David Weiss had.

Best of luck!  I'm guessing we're both going be making ourselves scarce around these blogs the next coupla days.  Peace!


[ Parent ]
And a thank you poem: (0.00 / 0)
It seems that you and me
Can agree to disagree
Much more sucessfully
Then Mr. Kyle Kotary!

:-)


[ Parent ]
I agree (4.00 / 2)
Thanks for taking your time to cover this race in such a comprehensive manner.

[ Parent ]
Oh yeah...WELL YOU'RE WRONG!!!! YAAAAARGH!!!! (0.00 / 0)
Actually, you just made a tiny boo-boo, and I have no reason to yell at you :-)  Good to see you while I was out canvassing for David Weiss, who is running an incredibly strong grass roots primary campaign in the 46th Senate District.  With two Democrats and two Republicans (I think...) vying to replace Uncle Joe Bruno Stadium in the 43rd, I would never have had time to cover that one, but it definitely is one of the ones to watch.  

Check out the two-way Dem primary campaign for the right to oust Republican Senator Hugh Farley in the 44th (I think...) and, of course, the totally kickass campaign of Farmer Don Barber in the Abraham Lincon On A Vaccuum Cleaner District to the north, south, and west of us.

Interestingly enough, Mr. Barber just recieved the endorsement of Hillary Clinton.  I guess Tracey Brooks, Clinton's former staffer, just wasn't the upstate New York politician that our United States Senator felt could win their race :-)  Hopefully, we'll have all four districts in the Capital Region delegation of the State Senate held by strong progressive Democrats as part of our brand new majority in January of 2009!

Just a minor correction; these districts are all gerrymandered and screwed up numerically anyway, and as you can see, I've been so busy with NY-21 and SD-46 that I can't seem to keep neighboring races straight!

Have fun at the polls tommorow, PineHills!  Peace!


[ Parent ]
Tracey Brooks for Congress (0.00 / 0)
Dear Colin Abele from Berne (aka Soundpolitic),

1. Tracey Brooks is the only candidate in the race that has made fighting for women's rights, fighting for pay equity and fighting to protect a woman's right to choose top priorities. She proudly stands by those ideals as do history making women like Sen. Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, the Honorable Geraldine Ferraro, Rep. Carolyn Maloney and local advocates and barrier-breakers like Mayor Ellen McNulty Ryan, Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand and others...18 million cracks in the ceiling and many more will be made in short order.

2. People are responding to Tracey's campaign because she's running for them -- for families who need affordable health care, for our communities who want our loved ones home from Iraq, for our veterans who need improved services, and for those hard working men and women struggling to pay the bills and keep up with high gas and grocery prices.

She's running to undo the damage done by George Bush's administration, to stand up to the Republicans and special interests in Washington who stand in the way of change, and to make our government accountable again - to our families, to our communities, to the people.

3. Tracey Brooks is an attorney, and since graduating from law school, has either practiced law or committed her time to public service.

4. Tracey Brooks was the only candidate in the 21st Congressional race invited to speak at this year's Democratic National Convention in Denver.

Tracey Brooks ran for Assembly in 2002 with the full endorsement of the Albany County Democratic Party. That year, our senior Democratic U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer supported her run. She spent the past three years working for our Democratic U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton and alongside our Democratic Congressman Mike McNulty, whose family has endorsed Tracey Brooks.

Furthermore, Tracey Brooks has spent her entire life advocating for Democratic ideals...whether her non-profit work with the Hudson Valley Girl Scout Council Board of Directors, Cystic Fibrosis Board of Directors, Albany CYO Basketball Coach, or working with pregnant teens in Schenectady...just a few examples...and much of that was in the 1990's, right after she graduated from college.

5. Tracey Brooks was born in Albany, grew up in Clifton Park and has resided in Coeymans for nearly a decade, moving into the house her grandparents built, after spending countless hours caring for them in their final days.

Ms. Brooks attended public schools and played on a state championship basketball team. (Yes, she not only made that shot in her TV ad - check it out at www.TraceyBrooks.com - but every shot in rehearsal.) At Albany Law School, where she attended on an Edgar and Margaret Sandman Fellowship in Aging Law and Policy, Brooks received the school's inaugural Kate Stoneman award for gender equity and policy.  

6. The Times Union endorsed Tracey Brooks saying:

"The five-way Democratic race has produced some good candidates, but one stands above the rest: Tracey Brooks.

In singling out Ms. Brooks, we can't help but note that there is little difference, policy-wise, among her and most of her opponents. They generally favor a single-payer universal health care system, a timetable for the U.S. military to leave Iraq, weaning the nation off foreign oil and investing heavily in alternative energy.

What it came down to, for us, was who would best carry forward those ideas and most effectively represent the district's interests in Congress. Which one, as a freshman representative, could stand out in a system based heavily on seniority?

Ms. Brooks has that edge. She has worked for and clearly studied one of the Senate's masters of political fine arts, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who distinguished herself as a freshman senator for her ability to forge bipartisan alliances. She is also the face of a new breed in Congress: young, articulate, forceful, energetic and progressive. She would fit well with the previous crop of freshmen, which has quickly gained influence because the Democrats' narrow majority in the House hinges on them. And, as Sen. Clinton's former regional director, Ms. Brooks knows the district as well, if not better, than her opponents."


Ladies and Gentlemen, Kyle Kotary: (4.00 / 1)
Dear Kyle Kotary from Bethlehem (aka a Town Councilman whose colleagues, Supervisor Jack Cunningham, Councilman Mark Hennessey, and Town Party Chair Matt Clyne have endorsed Phil Steck)

1.  All the candidates in the race have expressed their dedication and concern for women's issues.  In particular, Phil Steck has successfully litigated far more difficult cases on the women's issues you describe above.  Your comment is case in point that Tracey Brooks simply repeats the same things over and over again, especially the "18 million cracks" talking point now being touted by, of all people, Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin.  I stand by my statement that it does not take a woman to advocate for women's issues.  Check out Senator Ted Kennedy's record on that one.  It's the same principle that an African-American President isn't needed to advocate for African-American issues.  See the record of Senator Kennedy's late brother's Jack and Bobby for that one.  The difference is that none of the men in the race are claiming they would be better at advocating for men's issues because they are men because it sounds just as foolish, and voters are smart enough to see through that.  And they did not appreciate the faceless men and the whole "those guys won't change anything."  Just as racism goes both ways, so does sexism.  I stand by my assessment that Tracey Brooks has been pandering to women voters this whole time, and it's just not the kind of politics I like to see.  We need a new kind of politics that does not try to exploit race, gender, religion, etc., just like Barack Obama has been saying as he leads our party to victory in November.

2.  People are responding to all the candidates messages.  And again, you are just repeating the same talking points that we've all heard way too many times.  If Tracey wanted to stand up to special interest money, she should have responded to Barack Obama's, Phil Steck's, and Darius Shahinfar's call to reject money from lobbyists and PACs.  But she couldn't because so much of her half-million dollar vote-buying contributions were bundled up in EMILY's List from outside the district.  That's not grassroots, and that's not what she described to me herself as EMILY's (early money is like yeast) List.  She's continued to rely on support from women's issues considerably more than grass-roots donations from within the district long after her campaign was in it's early stages.

3.  The information you provide here is availble in the Interview and the many debates linked to above.  Again, I find it amazing that a paid communications director who's candidate told me they would not be responding to comments in the blogosphere felt compelled to, again, say the same thing over and over again late at night with only two days to go until the primary when his time would be better spent getting some rest.  I've quite obviously gotten under your skin, and as an unpaid blogger dedicated to the truth, I have no qualms responding to concern trolls of any kind before I pack things in myself.  In fact, I find this rather hilarious :-)

4.  Denver is not within the 21st Congressional District.  Some people may like that fact, others may not.  As you said, I'm entitled to my opinion.  If Tracey Brooks was so concerned with the District, I believe she should have remained in the district instead of spending her campaign contributions on a trip to Denver.  And while she was there, she didn't sign on to the pledge to reject lobbyist and PAC money that propelled the person who was nominated at that convention to his historic nomination.

Also, this is not 2002 and this is not a race for Assembly.  It is 2008 and this is a race for Congress.  Again, the information you give is made available in the interview and the debates.  And Tracey Brooks had the lowest level of support from the Albany County Democratic Committee's screening committee this year, 2008.  Senator Schumer has made no endorsement this year.  And, quite glaringly, Senator Clinton has not endorsed Tracey Brooks either, which tells me that perhaps her work for Senator Clinton was not so highly regarded. Also, Congressman McNulty made it clear he would make no endorsement; that is made slightly empty, in my opinion, when she recieves the endorsement of his family members, especially when Mayor Ellen McNulty-Ryan said in a recent Metroland article that she is "nongendered" when it comes to these things, only to turn around and claim that "men just want to take credit for things, women just want to get things done," which I believe only adds to my case that the Brooks campaign is in fact based on gender and sexism.

5.  Once again, all that stuff is in the interview.  Why are you wasting your time?  You gave me no thanks for posting all this information before, choosing only to send me criticism in my inbox.

And this is a race for Congress, not to be on some basketball team.  If I was running for Congress, I wouldn't be making commercials of me slapping my bass guitar at 80 beats per minute or hooting and hollering about how I was captain of my high school cross country and track and field team.  Surely all these candidates have some sort of talents outside of politics...but they are irrelevant to the issues of the campaign and, in my opinion, it's cheesey campaigning.  Is that an opinion I can be entitled to?  Your seem to be splitting hairs on this one, Kyle...

6.  The Times Useless endorsed Tracey Brooks.  I don't feel it does her any good.  The TU is, in my view, the shoddiest news publication out there.  Case in point:  check out this Sunday's edition and compare it to the Schenectady Gazette:  not only did the Electric City's newspaper put out a huge front-page and full-page article of the candidates twice as large as anything on the 21st in the Hearst Corporation's Times Union, but the Gazette also published an article on the 46th State Senate District that was easily three times a prominently placed and lengthly as anything the Times Union has embarassingly put forth...and the Gazette's Schenectady County isn't even in the 46th Senate District.

I didn't just make up the whole "Times Useless" moniker either.  I've been hearing it since I was a little kid.  Furhermore, you make no mention of TU columnist Fred LeBrun's complete about-face in his most recent column on the race, declaring the race too close to call.  This is a complete contradiction of his May column's write off of all the other candidates in favor of Tracey before the campaign had even taken it's final shape, and which the Brooks campaign placed on all of it's mailers, making it look like you've had the endorsement all along.  That's pretty cheap and confusing to voters, Kyle.  And finally, on the many occassions I've met Tracey and asked her if she's seen this article or that article, she's said no; she doesn't even read the newspapers that cover the district  And she's walking around saying she "knows" the district better than anyone else?  This is a prime example of what I see as talking out both sides of the mouth like the slick, dishonest politician I see Tracey to be.  That's just my opinion; why are you wasting your time rebuking it when you said you wouldn't respond to these comments?

Thank you, Kyle, for just providing me with an excellent opportunity to back up my non-endorsement of Tracey Brooks.  And thank you for opening up this can of worms.  Since what you've said to me here is basically the same as some of the nasty e-mails you've sent me, I will now consider all those from the past to be on the record, and will gladly take liberty to post them should I feel the need to get the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth out about the people who Tracey Brooks has surrounded herself with should you push me an inch further.  Consider yourself forewarned.

You should have just been nice, man.  That gets you much farther in life.  And one more thing:  these blogs are changing the way political messaging works, and we deserve and expect to be treated with respect.  If you wish to stay involved in politics, I suggest you get used to these changes.  You have displayed the complete opposite and I'm very dissapointed, but also extremely amused :-)  Rather than becoming frustrated with the fact that best blogger on this race (and those are the words of the other campaigns, not me tooting my own horn) didn't come out for your canidate and posting long comments that frankly make you look rather whiny and desperate, you should have just taken a deep breath, let it go, and gotten back to work.

Good night, Kyle.  This has been a lot of fun.  And have a nice, pleasant, and productive last coule days of the campaign.


[ Parent ]
Dear Kyle: Many words, but no shred of anything that will convince many participants in this progressive forum (4.00 / 1)
1. I take Kyle Kotary's total non-response (in an extremely wordy posting!) to Soundpolitic's point about Tracey Brooks' Republican connections & even Republican identification into this past decade as an admission of guilt.  (And, I'm sorry, for any engaged progressive citizen, it is a credibility-eroding matter of guilt by complicity.)

2. Kyle Kotary's post confirms Soundpolitic's charge that the Brooks campaign is one-dimensional -- namely, drowning the citizens of the district in misleading paid bullshit on the teevee etc.  Hint: when your candidate says this self-serving rhetoric on the teevee ("people are responding!" "entire lifetime advocating for Democratic ideals!"), all we can do is throw things at the set.  But it just won't cut it on a forum for people who care about informing themselves to vote in Better Democrats!

3. The Times Union would endorse Alan Keyes if he were the candidate of the corrupt machine, the deadweight McNulty, & Co.  Enough said about that!


[ Parent ]
P.S. I'm just an ordinary district resident who didn't realize the seat was open (and evil might need to be averted) until I got a Tracey Brooks mailer. May many more like me be heard tomorrow. N/T (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
See, Kyle? (0.00 / 0)
I am by no means unique in my extremely low opinion of Miss Tracey Brooks.

I hope she doesn't win her seat.

And I hope Mr. Kotary loses his seat on the Bethlehem Town Board as well.  The people of that Township don't need councilmen who engage in such despicable activity as this.

Peace!


[ Parent ]
And a thank you... (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for noting our candidate's and campaign's tireless efforts and disciplined messaging. I'll take that as a compliment.

Thanks too for referencing our massive outreach efforts including 104 press releases, nearly a dozen mailers, 4 Tv ads, multiple radio ads, the only telephone town hall meeting which reached out to 30,000 voters in a single night, along with Tracey's tireless efforts on the campaign trail. In fact, she was the only Democratic candidate to participate in every debate and committee endorsement presentation.

As for the rest, well you're entitled to your opinions but not your own facts and I will continue to let you know when you confuse the two. In your own words, "There can be no civility without honesty."  

Peace.


Well, there you have it: In Tracey's Own Words: (0.00 / 0)
From her interview, linked to above:

"We're running a campaign on the issues, so we're not responding," Brooks said of individual comments on the blogosphere.

Does that fit your definition of "disciplined messaging?"

Absolutely amazing to see the only communications director working on one these campaigns not only breaking their own rules, but at one o'clock in the morning with only two days to go for the primary.  Absolutely amazing.


[ Parent ]
Tracey Brooks is better qualified ... (4.00 / 2)
... for the Vice Presidency than fellow basketball star Sarah "Barracuda" Palin, having at least some knowledge of national and international issues, working with Senator Clinton, who is far better qualified than John McCain in knowledge, judgement and temperament.  

I agree with the title of Dee Dee Myers' book  Why Women Should Rule the World, but my political view of Ms. Brooks is based on the disappointing policy record of her mentors, Hillary and Bill Clinton.  

After hearing at least three NY-21 debates, and reading issue positions, IMO Ms. Brooks is the fourth best qualified Democratic candidate for Congress in this district.

I concur with Soundpolitic's preference order:
1 Phil Steck
2 Darius Shahinfar
3 Paul Tonko
4 Tracey Brooks

Joe Sullivan I would give a grade of Z as in Zell.


not sure if you caught it... (0.00 / 0)
Brooks was far and away the best candidate on the candidate forum radio interview the other day on Homo Radio, WRPI. Brooks showed a much greater knowledge of the issues and her level of caring shined throughout the interview. Noticably and disappointingly absent was Paul Tonko.

As a someone who has closely followed the blogs and has a geniune interest in politics, government, and our community, it's disappointing that some people feel it necessary to attack a candidate or to attack people publicly and not keep differences of opinions to themselves. I do think that it's fair for a campaign to respond with facts, or at least as they see them, when confronted with negative attack ads, negative blogs, etc. What's also disappointing, is that our public discourse often gets too personal and political and not enough philosophical or community focused.  In the end, it is true that I am voting for Tracey Brooks, because I believe that she's the best candidate, but I also have a tremendous ammount of respect and admiration for ALL the candidates, even those that I disagree with.

And, on a final note, I'd like to remind everyone that in less than 36 hours we need to put behind these primary differences and come together to ensure that we elect Barack Obama president and send Democrats to Congress, not only in the 21st and 20th, but throughout the country as well.  Nothing less than our future is at stake here.


and (0.00 / 0)
I wish I had proofread that previous post for errors, I apologize for the few typos.

[ Parent ]
Well... (0.00 / 0)
it's disappointing that some people feel it necessary to attack a candidate or to attack people publicly and not keep differences of opinions to themselves

I agree.  But I also agree that it's disappointing that some paid campaign staffers feel it's necessary to attack a blogger both priavely and publicly and not keep differences of opinions to themselves like the professional they claim themself to be.

I don't believe Brooks is the best candidate; I believe she is the worst candidate, and her communications director just couldn't take it.  That's the long and short of it.


[ Parent ]
Colin (0.00 / 0)
Soundpolitic: The race is over and hopefully you will stop the personal public attacks on people. None of us in the netroots like such hateful language. You do a disservice to us all.

I've reread all of the blog entries here to ensure that I make a fair judgement on this, and through and through it it looks to me like Kyle Kotary did his job which was to make the case for his candidate and defend her against attacks, including your very negative and nasty blog attacks against both Ms. Brooks and Mr. Kotary.

I don't see a single attack here except from you. The Brooks response on here was a pretty clear and simple point by point rebuttal to your harsh opinions. That's all. Is there not freedom of speech on TAP? As for whatever beef you have between the two of you -- well, who cares. The rest of us don't, so have some integrity and keep it between the two of you.

I don't know any of you personally, and I did support Brooks because I felt (and still do) that she was the best candidate, and I only commented here in response to what I thought was useless gossip and attacks, not good reporting. But I did see and hear all the nasty negative attack ads and despicable dirty tricks coming out of the Steck campaign, including what was sent to me in the mail...and even this was reported in the TU today, "In a race between candidates of similar positions -- who played nice most of the time -- Steck was the only candidate to use an attack ad against his opponents."

You proudly professed to be a loyal follower of Mr. Steck, who I personally know to have angered many people because of his dirty tactics including sending a nasty, gutless attack on Paul Tonko that I received in the mail! And Mr. Weiss, your other cause, verbally assualted a personal friend of mine at the door because they said they supported Neil Breslin.

So, Mr. SP, be very careful about your actions and who YOU associate yourself with - two losing candidates who publicly attacked others with hateful nastiness does not bode well for one's career in the public forum...

So you lost...and your guy Weiss got trounced too...just move on and stop the hateful public attacks. In the end we are all on the same team, and I hope someday you realize that. Negative attacks and the type of campaigning that you and Phil Steck engaged in is not good for Democrats and not good for America, and I think that's something that Americans are realizing as elections continue in the 21st century. Please take the time to reexamine you're actions and words throughout this primary race...I hope that you realize that the way you acted was incredibly out of line, especially towards the end, and that those kinds of actions are not necessary in the future.  I do thank you for your exhaustive coverage of the 21st, at times it was a joy to read, and I look forward to reading you again in the future...


[ Parent ]
Yes, the race is over (0.00 / 0)
But I do not believe I engaged in personal attacks.  The two words "personal attacks" are a constantly used framework in politics, most frequently when simply the idea that behavior is being engaged in when in fact it is not.  I pointed out factual information.  You may look at them as attacks, I saw it as very contentious debate.  There's a difference.

Recieving belittling and and frankly, threatening personal e-mails from a professional...now that's a personal attack.  And Tracey's attacks couldn't be called personal because she never put a face to her opponents.  She chose instead to attack the entire male gender by campaigning as though we didn't matter and by exploiting the woman vote.  So don't talk to me about mailers, because I've collected them all.  And the amount of "negative" ones put out by Phil Steck pales in comparison to the amount of "positive" literature he distributed.  But I blogged before about her own personal attacks; if you think Tracey Brooks did not engage in the differentiating process between her and her opponent by making a case against her opponents, then you clearly weren't paying attention as close you claim to be.

It was the degree of unprofessionalism and the degree of disrespect I saw from Mr. Kotary and the Brooks campaign towards me in the face of unanimous praise from the other campaigns themselves that I decided warranted posting the information (that is, the whole truth) in a public forum.  You know, part of the reason these blogs are so important and need to become more widely read is because they are not a part of the underworld of mainstream journalism, which is just as corrupt and dysfunctional as the underworld of politics.  A campaign's communications's director is part of both worlds.  And newspaper articles frequently quote what these guys say, so why can't I?  And I've said before:  I'm not a huge fan of the whole "on the reocrd/off the record" deal.  If someone says something to me and my ears heard it, that makes it true.  And my goal is here is to capture the truth and tell people exactly how I feel about it.  

Feel free to disagree, but know this:  I'm tired as hell.  And I didn't wake up today to continue arguing with people who didn't like the way I reported this race for obvious reason.  You just couldn't seem to wait.  Good for you.
And if you don't see a single "attack" on any other candidates from anyone else on these blogs, then it's very clear that you've quite simply got it out for the blogger who didn't support your candidate.  All sorts of supporters attacked all kinds of candidates.  The "Phil Steck is arrogant" line was rather common, man, and it didn't come from me.  And I came to the defense of Paul Tonko when one commentor on another board tried to question the reasons for his bachelorhood.  I've even come to the defense of Miss Brooks when she was recieving flak for going to Denver.  So you can try to charge me with being "hateful"...I don't see any hate speech in my comments.  And you can try to accuse my actions of being bad.  Here's what I was doing towards the end of the campaign:  going door-to-door with David Weiss for ten hours a day.  I hit between three and four thousand doors myself talking face to face with people.  And I have a very good idea of what David Weiss said and why the voter considered it a verbal assault.  It's the same principle that applies as to why you are here attacking me and not offering up proof to back them up:

Sometimes, carsales, the truth hurts.

And if we can't have the truth, then we can't have debate, and all we're left with is the childish, destracting back and forth charges of "you hit me" and "you hit me first" that is partially responsible for the gridlock, not in government, but in the electorate.

But see, the primary is in the past, and I also didn't come out here to rub in who lost last night.  I'm here to set the record straight because Paul Tonko won and I'm focused on keeping that record straight and this seat Democratic in the future.  My words and actions of the past speak for themselves, and yes, my coverage of NY-21 will continue in general election mode, and you'll hear much more about the most important primary loss in the state, SD-46.  I'm also hoping to have time to snatch up the new Democratic nomiees in neighboring Senate districts to interview here, and I'm going to ask them questions that are just as tough.  Because I'm not here just to be nice to all Democrats.  I'm here to push the progressive wing of the party.  One of the things you hear at the doors most often when asking about party registration is "I don't vote for the party, I vote for the person."

Well, it's my opinion that Tracey Brooks was a terrible person to vote for, and over two thirds of the electorate agreed.  It's my opinion that Phil Steck is an excellent candidate, and I'll be voting for him on the Independence Line in November.  And it's my opinion that Paul Tonko will win, and I want to do both another, even longer interview with him as well as walk some doors for him to help unify the party.  But I still don't believe he's the best candidate.  Are you going to spend hundreds of words on that next?  If you do, perhaps you can attempt to specifically refute some of the facts that determined my low opinion of Tracey Brooks, something that no Brooks supporter, whether are cheerleader or a campaign staffer, has ever done.  And by the way, I enjoy quickly getting my true thoughts down in response to these kinds of charges.  It what I think, I don't mind people knowing exactly what I think, and I don't believe that offense should be taken when one's opinions are debated, but definitely should be taken (and remedied) when facts are ignored by partisans.  But since you want to know more, I'll see if I have time for a diary that makes the Brooks camps misconduct crystal clear.

That's all.  It's behind me.  On to the general.  Good morning.


[ Parent ]
One last thing: (0.00 / 0)
From your comment above:

And, on a final note, I'd like to remind everyone that in less than 36 hours we need to put behind these primary differences and come together

I suppose you forgot that you said that when you woke up in the morning itching to "put these primary differences behind us" by posting up hundreds of words reminding us of them.  Way to be consistent.  Peace,

Colin


[ Parent ]
The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Group News Blog
Jason Gooljar
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Take19
The Community Alliance

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice
Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network
>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox