| I was reading through this piece today that talks about Sarah Palin's tanning bed in the Governor's mansion in Alaska and how that has brought attention to Dan Humiston, who is running against Rep. Brian Higgins in the 27th congressional district. Humiston is the founder of Tanning Bed, an indoor tanning franchise with 34 locations in New York.
This is what Humiston had to say about Palin's "right to tan" (from the Buffalo News):
While some bloggers are using the news to attack the priorities of Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee, Humiston defended her right to tan.
"Kudos to Gov. Palin for standing up to members of the sun scare industry who are trying to frighten
Americans away from [ultraviolet] light," Humiston said in a statement widely reprinted on blogs and news Web sites.
I don't care if she tans. No one does. A lot of women (and even some men I know) tan. It makes them feel good. It makes them feel better during the cold winters here in Western New York where there is lots of snow but not a lot of sun.
But whether or not she tans isn't the issue here. It's the fact that she had a tanning bed installed in the governor's mansion. A tanning bed can cost $35,000 to install in a home. It has been said that Palin paid for the bed for her own money, which if she did, that's fine too. But does one really need a tanning bed in his or her home? Especially in the governor's mansion, where the people of Alaska pay the electric bill?
All I'm saying is that this isn't about the fact she tans. A lot of people tan. It's nothing earth-shattering. But when you decide that you need a tanning bed in your home and that home just happens to be the governor's mansion, it's going to be scrutinized. |