the albany project

behind that door are three five men in a room...



About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

Resources
- Searchable Senate Pork Data (2004-2005) - On-line

- Searchable Senate Pork Data (2004-2005) - Downloadable PDF File

- Searchable Senate Pork Data (2003-2004) - Downloadable PDF File

- Assembly 2002-2006 and Senate 2005-2006 Pork Spreadsheet

-What Is "Spotlight" And How Do I Use It?

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

Wishing for Governor Obama

by: simonstl

Thu Jan 22, 2009 at 08:54:33 AM EST


Imagine reading this (slightly modified) in your local paper:

ALBANY - Governor Obama moved swiftly on Wednesday to impose new rules on government transparency and ethics, using his first full day in office to freeze the salaries of his senior aides, mandate new limits on lobbyists and demand that the government disclose more information.

Mr. Obama called the moves, which overturned two policies of his predecessors, "a clean break from business as usual." ... the actions were another sign of the new president's effort to emphasize an across-the-board shift in priorities, values and tone.

"For a long time now there's been too much secrecy in this city," Mr. Obama said at a swearing-in ceremony for senior officials at the Legislative Office Building, adjacent to the Capitol. He added, "Transparency and rule of law will be the touchstones of this governorship."

Obama understands the basic breakdown in American politics, I think. It's not just ideology, but trust.

The past thirty years have seen an accelerating breakdown of trust in government. Much of that is because Republicans are shouting "don't trust the government" to their followers while behaving in ways that make non-Republicans doubt all of the rest of what they're saying. However, while I'd like to say it's a Republican problem, it's far from solely their responsibility. Democrats have unfortunately also abused trust on a regular enough basis to be unforgettable.

It's an open question whether or not Obama can reverse that slide at the federal level. Rebuilding trust after it's been lost is a tremendous challenge, and redemption doesn't come easily.

At the state level, though, I fear we're not even trying. Spitzer was all about reform, but even beyond the scandal that removed him, he seemed to enjoy the cloak-and-dagger of backroom politics in ways that might even have damaged trust more severely had he stayed in office. Paterson, while I applaud his openness about the explosions coming in the state budget, seems extremely comfortable with three men in a room and the current status quo.

The same is true of our legislators, in both parties. Silver and the Assembly Democrats hand out little tokens of openness when it seems that enough people notice what an absurdly closed process they run. Senate Republicans barely even did that until they were in the minority. Their grandstand of proposing the same rules reform that the Democrats had offered in 2007 did very little - except demonstrate how resistant those with power can be to change. (The Senate Democrats now unanimously voted against their earlier proposal.)

We can't have Obama for governor for lots of reasons, I understand. We have a long ways to go to see how his efforts at the federal level change the government and citizens' trust in it.

Still, I hope our own Governor and state legislators will note that it's possible to change direction, to seek a clean break, and to work toward building broad trust rather than narrow coalitions of donors and constituencies.

I know, I know - it's a dream. One worth pursuing, though!

simonstl :: Wishing for Governor Obama
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
ethical reforms (4.00 / 1)
Ethical reforms are worth it if they produce real-world results.

My reaction to Obama's announcements yesterday were different; I saw mainly what any institution or corporation does when it wants to look like it's changing something - a symbolic cut of the top executive's and executive staffers' pay.   So, that's nice, but I'll hold the applause (respectfully).  What executives of bad companies usually need to do is take a power cut, which means cutting the power/salaries/numbers of the management layers just below the top.

A pay cut without a power cut means little -- especially when the people at the bottom of the system are being obliged to take pay/job cuts, with no corresponding rise in power, and even with a continued insidious drain on their power to control things.

Now, I imagine ethics rules are supposed to dilute the top-heaviness of power in our democratic system; but I don't know if anyone will follow up and examine how well that works.  

Where is the U.S. version of the Brennan Center Report?

 


I think you may be questioning this (0.00 / 0)
because you don't, ahem, trust government, so you don't trust this to go anywhere better than previous announcements.

Yes, we have to wait to see the real-world results.  We're still recovering from Spitzer's real-world results, after all.

From what I've seen of how Obama's going about implementing this announcement - shutting down secret detention centers on one level, ordering FOIA requests to be taken seriously, on another - I have some hope that there's substance here beyond the modification in salary numbers.

The biggest problem I see is getting past the cynicism.  Doing that will indeed take more than announcements.  As a start, though, it seems like the right start.


[ Parent ]
actually (0.00 / 0)
I'm questioning it because I'm watching a lot of troubled companies "restructure" like this right now.

It seems too early either to praise or to condemn the new administration.  To quote William Shakespeare:  "Lurk, lurk..."  (one of his greatest and handiest lines.)


[ Parent ]
I just came through a sudden re-org, so could be skeptical, (0.00 / 0)
but I'm not seeing transparency as a priority of most troubled companies.  

They seem to see rebuilding shareholder trust as a matter of paying off or paying out as much as they can, not of actually, you know, acting in a trustworthy fashion.  Well, unless they have to, because regulators or Congress insist.

(I'll give my employer credit for sharing financial information within the company, though.)


[ Parent ]
hey (0.00 / 0)
glad to hear of your survival!  

Yes, you're right that transparency is not the first instinct, so that is different.

However, I still ask:  Where is America's Brennan Center Report?  Because at least here in New York we have a somewhat authoritative road map to refer to, a framework for the press to refer to when questioning what Albany does.  It's not a powerful framework, but in 2004 this commanded the attention of the state and its citizens.  

Without an authoritative indictment of the way the U.S. government has been operating, prepared independently of those in power, there is no big picture for citizens to refer to in order to skeptically separate real progress from attractive sideshow.


[ Parent ]
Trust (0.00 / 0)
Average people started to distrust the government back then not because they were told to do so by Republicans but because they had seen huge government failures, usually entangled in deceit, such as Vietnam, Watergate, the collapse of Keynesian monetary policy and the failure of the Great Society.

I think district of government is an essential American trait.  It's what the wise men who founded the country advised from Jefferson to Washington.

All modern politicians basically peddle the same message, that massive centralized force, i.e., the government, can improve human life.  To sell that obvious falsehood, they have to lie.  


and the Constitution is an effort (0.00 / 0)
to ensure that people can trust their government even though it's made up of imperfect people.

Go on, keep peddling your "government can't improve human life" message.  It's all part of politics.  I just hope it's a politics we can push back for a while.


[ Parent ]
hear hear (4.00 / 1)
well said.

TODAY is day one. It always is.

Revolving door policies (4.00 / 1)
What made me trust this, and actually made my day, was not the pay freeze stuff, which I agree may be mostly symbolic.... but, rather, the new rules regarding lobbying.  The combination of a commitment to more transparency, and a radical slowing of the revolving door between lobbyists and the administration, could really change the nature of the discourse.  And bring back trust.

Make an argument (0.00 / 0)
"Go on, keep peddling your "government can't improve human life" message."

When you make an actual argument, let me know.


I didn't see much of an argument in your post (0.00 / 0)
Just a nonsense assertion that "government can't improve human life".

That's kind of an extreme statment - do you really want to live in pure anarchy?  Are we idiots for merely wanting to have some government?  If it's no improvement, why bother at all?

But hey, I'm sure you're having fun pushing that on a non-libertarian site.  Just don't expect me to take you seriously.


[ Parent ]
My argument (0.00 / 0)
I didn't make a complete argument but I suggested one: violence is not compatible with successful human life because it negates the thing essential to life, the use of the mind.  The purpose of violence is, of course, to overcome the will, the mind of the object of the force.

It follows that government, which is organized force, violence if you will, is a negative thing, a thing that stops things from happening.  Life, however, requires positives: thought, work, production, etc.  

It is true that government can steal from some and give to others but I challenge anyone to show that this has improved human life.  It causes a reduction of production, obviously by all three groups involved in the process of predation: the producer, the thief and the recipients as well.  

So that's a sketch of an argument I have made at great length elsewhere and others before me have made at even greater length for hundreds of years.  It's never been refuted, just ignored.

(In fact, our opponents often insist that such arguments are "metaphysical" and not empirical and can never be proven-call that the virus of philosophical pragmatism whose political branch is liberalism.)

I go on liberal sites because I wish to engage in a rational dialogue on these issues.  It rarely happens because I find most people prefer to cling to their views rather than defend them.

I press on, buoyed by what I view of the cascading collapse of the progressive/liberal corporate state which has held sway in American since about 1917.  


I'm a pacifist too (0.00 / 0)
But I find your notion that government is the source of violence - indeed the only source of violence you mention here - to be absurd.

We can go on about political philosophy for a long long time, but I suspect we'll just be stuck on the same basic question:

Do we trust individuals, or the group?

My answer is both, and neither.  Government is - in today's system - supposed to take both into account.  We have to achieve balance.

That makes it extremely difficult to take claims like yours seriously.

(And 1917 as a date - I'm guessing you mean the entry of the US into WWI.  Why not go back to 1913 and object to the income tax?  Or get all nostalgic for the Gilded Age?)


[ Parent ]
Violence (0.00 / 0)
I never said government is the only source of violence.  The subject was why people don't trust government.  I responded that it's because politicians must lie because their basic message--that a coercive institution (above and beyond keeping the peace), can improve life, is false.  

But government, unlike criminals, has a legal monopoly on violence which is why the government is much more dangerous.

1917--yeah, the war.  War is the health of the state.  If you look at a chart of gov. spending in American history, 1917 was the start (leaving aside the blip of the Civil War) of huge government spending that continues and intensifies at this very moment.  Yes, the income tax and Federal Reserve came in just prior and laid the groundwork for the mess we are in now.  


and on and on... (0.00 / 0)
I'd love to reach a non-coercive society.  I don't think striving for the end of "government coercion" even resembles the path there. We seem to be looking at the world through opposite ends of the telescope.

It's good to know where you're coming from, so thanks.


[ Parent ]
Gillibrand, transparency (0.00 / 0)
Okay, I was hoping for Obama-like moves toward transparency in NYS.  Not today, I guess, but it turns out that Paterson's appointment of Gillibrand at least points that direction for the federal level.

An encouraging sign?


The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

10,000 Things
Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Buffalo Stuff
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
Danger Democrat
Democracy in Albany
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Gowanus Lounge
Group News Blog
Herkimer County Progressive
Intrepid Liberal Journal
Jason Gooljar
Joshing Politics
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Nasty Letters
New York NewsLadder
NY-13
NYCO's Blog
onNYTurf
Peter King Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Skelos Watch
Soundpolitic
The Community Alliance
The Fighting 29th
The Robach Files
The Rural Patriot
Tom Reynolds Watch
Troy Polloi
Upstate 2050
Upstate Blog
Upstate Blue
Walsh Watch
WFP Blog

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States
Taub Urban Research Center

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network

>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Billmon
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Open Left
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq - Click here to add your support

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Rojo

Add the albany project RSS Feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Add to Google

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in FeedLounge

Add to netvibes

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to Bitty Browser

Subscribe in NewsAlloy

Subscribe in podnova

Add to Pageflakes

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 5 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox