According to the conservative Republican line of thinking, one is "insensitive" and the other is what a true conservative should do with government spending and economics.
To post this comment click here:
Otherwise click cancel.
I have an idea...I think dog owners should be taxed more by paying additional fees to register their animals, admittance of these animals into parks (the damage they cause by digging, chewing, and owners who don't clean up after their animals), and maybe even a levy on dog treats. After all, pet ownership is a luxury as those who are less fortunate probably can't afford them. Those who are more "wealthy" or have more free income can. Those monies generated could be used for other things. Mr. Anderson, certainly you have the means to pay a little more if you can take care of the health and feeding of such a luxury item. Imagine if all the dog owners contributed a little more? How many millions more would the state have? Why hasn't the WFP started to run with this!?!?!
Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address
Delivered by FeedBurner