About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

More, Better, and Cheaper; Alternative energy from a rural viewpoint.

by: Adama D. Brown

Tue Dec 29, 2009 at 19:06:35 PM EST


The following was also posted at GLOWDemocrats.com.

After my post the other day agreeing with Rep. Chris Lee's move on energy efficiency, I got to thinking about the parts of the energy picture, the ones nobody's talking about. Everyone likes to talk about alternative energy in vague terms like "green economy." What does it really mean for an area like ours, where the new natural resources actually are? And what actions do we need to take to make it practical for individuals, families, and small businesses to take advantage of?

Adama D. Brown :: More, Better, and Cheaper; Alternative energy from a rural viewpoint.
1. A start-up program for the use of renewable energy. A lot of people out here would be happy to use locally produced energy or make their own, but they can't afford the investment of getting started.

A perfect example would be the use of small wind turbines. Many rural property owners out here have enough room to put up a small wind turbine, say a 60-foot elevation and 3 kW nameplate capacity. That would cut the electrical bill in half for most people, and could eliminate it entirely for low use or particularly efficient homes. But most people also can't invest the roughly $4000 it would cost to set up a system like that, even though it would pay for itself in five to seven years.

This would be a good time to point out that you could equip every rural home in Wyoming County like this for the amount of money that we spend in Iraq every four hours.

By providing a start-up investment for those who want it, it provides an immediate short term benefit in the form of lowering people's bills. In the long term, it produces more money than it costs, making it a good investment. And it reduces the environmental impact of generating electricity, eliminating things like mercury in the environment from coal plants. And if the turbines are locally manufactured (which they can be) then it puts life back into our local economy in the form of decent paying manufacturing jobs.

2. Making biofuels make sense. The most famous form of biofuel is ethanol of course, but around here we should be talking just as much about biodiesel. Biodiesel is is essentially identical to regular diesel fuel or home heating oil, except that instead of being refined from petroleum, biodiesel is produced from things like vegetable or animal oil, the same used oil that comes out of deep fryers in restaurants. Biodiesel can be relatively easy to make even in small quantities, making it ideal for decentralized production in rural areas. This not just creates fuel, but it solves a real world waste management problem, of what to do with used cooking oil that would otherwise be unhealthy for the environment. Moreover, beyond the world of used cooking oil and other wastes, the raw material for biodiesel can be easily grown in places that aren't fit for other farming--common algae from dug ponds and swamps produces large amounts of biodiesel when processed.

An added benefit is that biodiesel is entirely biodegradable, so spills simply can be washed away instead of requiring complicated cleanup, and it's less hazardous to people than is normal diesel fuel and heating oil.

Even more promising for our area is biogas. This is basically just combustible gas produced from any biological source. For instance, the end product of all those tens of thousands of cows out here. A simple system called an "anaerobic digester," which is basically a high tech composter, can take cow manure (and almost any other biological waste) and convert it into relatively clean-burning gas that can be used to generate electricity or heat a building.

And not only can the left-over byproduct, called "digestate," still be used to fertilize the fields for growing next year's feed, it's also more sanitary and less smelly after it's been used to produce gas.

Is this really a big enough benefit to bother with, though? Hell yes. I can't point out the benefits any better than Popular Mechanics, who had an article in their February 2009 issue talking about a cow farm in Pennsylvania which had set up just such a system. One large scale enough to handle the output from their 600 cows, with a little help from the combination of federal grants and money from a carbon offset company for the CO2 the farm would be saving from converting biogas into green electricity though a generator. Via Popular Mechanics:

Last year the system produced 1.2 million kilowatt-hours of electricity, enough to power the farm and several nearby homes, as well as their heat and hot water-saving about $60,000. "It's covering everything, and there's still some left over," Saylor says. "We had 100,000 kwh last year that we didn't use." The local utility paid him 2.3 cents per kwh to put the excess into the grid. The digester also produces more gas than Saylor can use, so with another grant, he plans to install a second 130-kw generator this winter. All of that electricity will go into the grid-and when utility rate caps start to come off this year, it'll be worth even more.

On a 600 cow farm, that translates to each cow producing about 2000 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year, enough to light up the average home for two months. Wyoming County has about 47,000 cows, which translates to 94 million kilowatt-hours annually... enough to supply the electrical demands of half the homes in the county. And once a farm's AD system and generator are in place, that's effectively free energy--all it takes is cow manure and some fine tuning to keep it running, and the digestate is an even more ideal fertilizer for the next year's feedstock crops than the raw manure. Nothing is lost.

3. Efficiency can mean "more and better." Usually when you talk about "efficiency" people assume that you mean cutting back on things, or doing things not quite as well. Just one example: we probably all know by now how much energy you can save by going from regular old fashioned lightbulbs to fluorescent ones, but you can save even more with LED bulbs. Something that's useful to all those farmers out there who have four foot fluorescent lights in their barns, when LED bulbs can give them less than half the electrical use in the same fixtures, while being nearly unbreakable.

Or the fact that electric and series-hybrid cars, which are finally starting to get on the road in significant numbers, can deliver not just massively improved fuel efficiency but also sportscar like performance out of even normal vehicles.

Increasing efficiency doesn't mean always mean turning down the thermostat or using fewer lights at night; it was the constant tweaking of efficiency and improving on existing designs to get more bang for your buck.

4. New technologies. There's a whole world of stuff out there waiting to be explored, sciences and approaches that that most people don't know exist yet. Like the work of Dr. Robert Bussard, a man who up until his death in late 2007 was a preeminent nuclear physicist for some 60 years, and in the last 15 years of his life developed the Polywell fusion plasma reactor under contract with the US government. Bussard famously said that when the full scale model was built, it would work, and when it worked, it would begin to displace all other forms of energy production.

Or wave energy, using networks of buoys spread out on the ocean to capture the power present in the constant churning of the sea--or, possibly, a Great Lake or two.

Not all of these, or even most of them, will be useful to our area, but in general, the lesson to be learned about new and green energy is that learning to develop our natural resources and use them better doesn't just not cost us anything, it can improve our economy, save us money, and leave more of the world behind for our children.  

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Here Here (4.00 / 1)
These are all great ideas and we need legitimate investment from the state to put these ideas into practice.

Wind driven turbines (4.00 / 1)
Another benefit of turbines is that they will keep running when there is a storm or an electrical blackout.

When severe winter storms hit the region, homeowners with turbines will have the power to run their furnaces and water pump.

HylasBrook


Interesting (0.00 / 0)
I'd like to know where you get the info for the vertical wind turbine -- which company, etc.  I've seen specs on a variety of turbines, including vertical turbines, and I haven't seen one that pays for itself withing ten years.

Miscommunication I think... (0.00 / 0)
I'm not talking about those Aussie-style vertical turbines, I'm talking about standard small windmill style turbines. The turbines themselves can be had for as little as $1000, plus $2000 for a grid-tie inverter, and let's stipulate another $1000 for the mounting hardware, wiring, and installation. Based on what I'm envisioning, that's quite reasonable.

Now, talking about a 3 KW nameplate capacity, and a small wind turbine reasonably well sited will probably turn out an average of 20% of nameplate capacity. That means that sometimes it's producing nothing, sometimes it's producing full bore, but that the mean output will be around 600 watts. 600 watts times 24 hours, times 365 days, is 5,256 kilowatt hours per year. That's about half the demand of the "average" US household. It may vary heavily out here in the rural areas, but if anything we're likely to be using a bit less.

Now, that much electricity if you're getting it from NYSEG costs about $100 a month or a little under. If we assume that you're talking $50 a month savings by cutting your grid usage in half, then that's $600 a year, or a return on investment in a bit under 7 years.

The numbers get better if the household in question is low usage, or if the turbine performs better than expected.  


[ Parent ]
Where (0.00 / 0)
Where can you get a 3kw turbine for so little?  I'm seeing prices much, much higher?

[ Parent ]
I'm basing my number runs on a couple of underlying assumptions... (0.00 / 0)
One is building turbines locally, for reasons of both convenience and to boost the local economy. With that in mind, the parts and labor for building a turbine to these specs aren't as unreasonable as you might think. Here's an example of a 3 KW nameplate turbine that can be readily built with minimal skilled labor.

http://www.otherpower.com/17pa...

This guy built his turbine haphazardly and alone, and still did it on the cheap. Factoring in paying somebody a living wage to do this work, and the efficiencies of scale that you get with putting, say, 100 people to work in a factory assembly line doing this, putting out turbines for $1000 each is not unreasonable, when you're separately figuring for the installation cost.

Most of the figures you see for small wind turbine costs are gratuitously overpriced because of the assumption that anyone interested in installing one must be some kind of nature freak with money to spare. But the technology is not complicated, and can be built in somebody's garage if they've got the patience and basic knowledge. Here's an example of a 2000 watt turbine that's priced at $650 despite including a charge controller.

http://tinyurl.com/y8p5qbe

But the core design featured on that page is what I'm talking about--a simple 3 KW turbine on a 60 foot pole. Here in my neck of the woods the average wind speed is about 14-15 miles per hour, which based on that design's performance would actually provide a lot more electricity than I conservatively accounted for in my figures, probably something around a thousand watts, maybe more.

Looking at a more optimistic projection, if you did have an "average" output of 1000 watts instead of the 600 I figured for, then you'd be talking about almost completely eliminating the average household's electrical bill. That's roughly 720 kilowatt-hours per month, compared to 800-900 used for the average house. At an average wind speed of 16 miles per hour, then you're talking 1500 watts output, and you're not only exceeding the demand of the average household but putting wattage back into the grid.


[ Parent ]
Need to Work on that Math, Dude.... (0.00 / 0)
Adama,

Well meaning, but your economics are way off base. The only part of the electric bill that you will shave off is the generated power part, which is currently between 3 to 5 cents/kw-hr. For example, here are today's predicted prices for the generated electricity part of the bill - for NYISO West (Zone A), it will likely be 3 c/kw-hr: http://mis.nyiso.com/public/ht...  

But, have fun trying out this site - your electric bill dollars at work: http://www.nyiso.com/public/ma...

So, 600 watts @ 730.5 hr/month = 438.3 kw-hr/month; * $0.03/kw-hr = $13.15/month. You would still have to pay the connection cost, and most of the transmission costs, and there are some months when the winds don't blow very much, and others that do. And even getting 20% out of these small, almost toy-like units is pretty rare, as they are best suited for fast winds like those in North Dakota, and we just don't have them in NY - even along the Lake Erie coastline - see http://wagengineering.blogspot... for that.

As for the cost of these small systems - they aren't cheap, and only PV systems makes them look sensible (PV units can deliver electricity at a cost of 60 to 80 cents/kw-hr in WNY). A 3 kw unit would cost $20,000, and a 10 kw Bergey would cost about $60,000. Of course, you can get lots of NYSERDA subsidies (see http://www.powernaturally.org/... but those don't really help matters that much. Small wind is just plain expensive compared to big wind for lots of reasons - physics and meteorology, wind shear and the cost of putting a generator 80 to 100 meters above the ground being major ones.

Anyway, there IS a way to make small wind viable - and that requires a Feed-In Law. You should look into NY A187/S2715 (see http://assembly.state.ny.us/le... for the text of the NY Renewable Energy Sources Act = NYRESA). This needs to be your PRIMARY FOCUS if you want to make renewable energy economically, and socially viable in NY State. A187/S2715 will make big wind, small wind, offshore wind, run-of-river, tidal, small hydro, biomass (wood) to co-gen, biogass (anaerobic digesters for dairy farmers!) economically viable - and even some PV, too. This is accomplished by providing a stable, realistic price for renewable electricity (based on the cost to produce it plus a reasonable profit) based on the technology used to make this electricity.

And guess what...it will actually drive the price of polluting (nukes, coal, natural gas, oil) derived electricity down on the NYISO market for some time, making those varmits slightly (initially) and then significantly (as oil/Ngas gets more expensive and as wind gets added in significant amounts) less profitable while delivering stable priced renewable electricity via a Feed-In Law. It's complicated, but here is an attempt at an explanation:
http://wagengineering.blogspot...

The NYRESA act is somewhat similar to Ontario's Green Energy Act (see http://www.greenenergyact.ca/ ), which has had about $100 to $200 BILLION worth of offshore (in the Great Lakes) projects proposed, and about $20 BILLION worth of onshore projects INITIALLY proposed, and about $5 BILLION worth which will be started (the construction/permitting part) in the spring of 2010. It is a humongous success.

Meanwhile, NY's Renewable Energy prospects are in the pits, along with electricity prices. If Renewable electricity prices are not freed from the prices of fossil fuels (and there is essentially no fossil fuel COST COMPONENT to renewables), we will have close to zip in terms of renewable energy development and green jobs/.green businesses in NY. It's that simple.

Anyway, if you would like to help in getting NYRESA passed (and lot's of help is needed!!!), please contact me at Tantalum73 at verizon dot net. Maybe make NYRESA your 2010 New Years Resolution....

So, here's to a windy and renewable future.....

Nb41


[ Parent ]
Wrong math, "dude" (0.00 / 0)
With all the charges, I'm currently paying over 21¢ per kilowatt-hour (Con Ed charges 10.06¢/KwH for "delivery", my "supply" charge is 9.2¢/KwH, and other surcharges add up to 1.88¢/KwH).

PV is a lousy way, economically, to deliver electricity -- even you say it costs 60-80¢/KwH, which is three to four times what I pay now.  By contrast, wind power is much cheaper -- although not quite as cheap as Adama says.

As regards NYRESA, I browsed (briefly) the bill text, but it will take a lot of research to figure out what it means; I'll be e-mailing you directly about this, because if it does make micro-wind economically viable without costing taxpayers too much, I'd be very interested.


[ Parent ]
Agree (0.00 / 0)
This is an area that we should really, really be more proactive about.  Coupla adds:

One of the very best values in the efficiency category is still good, old-fashioned insulation.  Can employ multitudes of only semi-skilled workers, save the planet, and help folks avoid drafts that make them sick, all in one.  While new housing tends to be built more efficiently (although building code improvements could boost that...), the existing housing stock can be sorely underinsulated-- especially rental units, where the landlord has little incentive to have work done if the tenant pays for the heat.  Mechanisms to get those dwellings insulated are not a sexy new technology, but, they sure do have potential at very low cost and high employment of local workers.

In the biomass category, we should not forget the value of more direct combustion.  Cordwood is practical, inexpensive and carbon-neutral throughout much of upstate's rural areas.  Simple policy changes, such as mandating that homeowners insurance companies and mortgage resale markets not discriminate against those heating with wood would allow much more use(that's right, folks, the Wall St. real estate bubble geniuses who brought down the economy with their slice-em-dice-em mortgage-backed securities have decided that wood heat, used by human society ever since Prometheus, is too risky.)  Additionally, advances in combustion technology have meant that wood pellet stoves are now a practical choice for both urban and rural home heating.  In Denmark, heating districts in urban areas often rely on one large boiler, often burning wood chips, to efficiently heat many, many homes and businesses in a single neighborhood.  Commercial wood chip boilers are now available from a Schnectady, NY manufacturer, ActBioenergy, and have proved an excellent way for facilities such as schools, prisons and municipal buildings to drastically reduce heating fuel costs, while going "green" with a climate-neutral fuel and reducing taxpayer expenses.  Talk about a win-win!
 


The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Group News Blog
Jason Gooljar
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Take19
The Community Alliance

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice
Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network
>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox