Gov. David A. Paterson personally helped draft a statement last month that he hoped would be endorsed by a woman involved in a domestic dispute with one of his top aides, proposing language asserting that there had been no violence in the encounter, according to three people with knowledge of the governor's role.
On the night of Feb. 16, with The New York Times preparing an article on the aide, David W. Johnson, Mr. Paterson told his press secretary the key points that needed to be included in a brief statement that was sent to the woman, Mr. Johnson's former companion, the three people said.
He said that the couple's breakup months earlier had been unfriendly but not violent, and that any charges related to the altercation had been dropped.
The language that was drafted, according to the people, was sent in an e-mail message to Mr. Johnson's former companion, Sherr-una Booker, through an intermediary, a woman who was a friend of both Mr. Paterson and Ms. Booker.
Ms. Booker refused to go along, telling the mutual friend at one point in the process that she would not participate in "a lie," according to two people briefed on the exchange.
Mr. Paterson, who himself had spoken with Ms. Booker several times in the preceding 10 days, was disappointed that she would not endorse his statement.
It sure looks like Paterson is up to his eyeballs in this stuff.
I honestly don't really understand how or why Paterson is still our governor.
