| In signs that our State Senate continues its slow move toward democracy, another bill reached the floor and failed to pass last week. It wasn't as visible as the Marriage Equality bill, and I wish I knew more of the backstory:
A bill (S.1635/A.9480) sponsored by Senate Environmental Conservation Committee Chairman Antoine Thompson that would expand the definition of who can make legal challenges under the state Environmental Quality Review Act, proved to be contentious, and it failed 29-32.
The bill would have allowed any member of the public to file a claim if they could show they would be been harmed by a SEQRA violation at least as much as any other member of the public at large. "They could make a plea but they have to be able to demonstrate that they've been harmed and then take that to court," said Thompson on the Senate floor.
It looks like Stachowski, Aubertine, and one other Dem voted against, as well as all the Republicans. Does anyone have more of the story on this? Where it came from and why?
From what I can gather this sounds like legislation I would have supported, but I'm still happy to see that legislation reaching the Senate floor and failing is no longer a sign of the apocalypse. |