About
The Albany Project seeks to return New York State Government to its rightful owners - the people.

Getting Started at the Albany Project

New York Blogwire



This belongs to you. Take it back...

SD-46: State of the Race, 9/9 to 9/12

by: Soundpolitic

Sun Sep 12, 2010 at 18:39:10 PM EDT


Final Push for Albany County State Senate Seat

Breslin Relies on Big $$ Advertising, Martland on Shoe-Leather and Big Momentum

Welcome back once again.  It's been only a few days since our last update to the hottest political contest in Albany County this year.  But with incumbent Senator Neil Breslin and primary challenger Luke Martland in the final push of what has become one of the most expensive primaries in the state, the news of Breslin's defense of the status quo and Martland's defiant stand against the established order continues to draw more attention.

A neat synopsis of the above-mentioned qualities of the race was presented by the local cable news channel YNN, formerly Capital News 9.  For those looking for a quick wrap-up of where things stands, this is a good entry.  Luke Martland gives a great interview while barnstorming the area, nicely juxtaposed against quoted text responses from a Breslin campaign spokesperson.

The rest of the story, including the Times Union' weak endorsement of Senator Breslin and continued debate over this race's relationship to Senator Pedro Espada, lies below the fold...

Soundpolitic :: SD-46: State of the Race, 9/9 to 9/12
Luke Martland

Photobucket

"Take Albany Back"

The best indicator of what's really going on in the Martland camp might not be coming from the media.  They are doing good job at letting voters know a race is on this year, and have been covering Martland's campaign and Breslin's service in the Senate closer than ever before.

Still, its the tone in the most recent e-mail to supporters that tells me this is campaign that is doing better than expected against very heavy odds.  It may be a longshot challenge, but you get the sense of serious momentum here:

In 2 days you will make a very important choice

For the first time in many years, voters in Albany County have a choice for State Senate.  On one hand the status quo and a legacy of late budgets, ever-rising taxes, jobs fleeing the area, corruption, incompetence and dysfunction.  On the other hand what I will fight for: responsible budgeting, term limits, a tax cap, and bringing jobs back to upstate.  And, an end to the corruption and dysfunction that has made our State Senate an embarrassment.

As we all know, in Albany County the primary is what matters.

Updates: door to door blitz and TV ad

Over the last 7 days we continued our door to door efforts. I have walked every day, usually from 10 or 11 a.m. until the sun sets.  Thank you to all the volunteers who have helped out!  We will continue our door to door blitz Sunday and Monday.  As always the response is fantastic and people deeply appreciate a candidate personally knocking on their door.  In the last email blast I asked for support to place our second ad on TV.  We received more then enough contributions, and were able to extend the ad's run.  Thank you everyone.

Now it's time to bring it home. Now it's time to win

This will be a very close and important race and your vote will make a difference. Remember to vote next Tuesday.  Polls are open from 12 noon to 9 p.m.

The focus on the the last-second uptick in advertising to counter the nearly 10 to 1 funding advantage Breslin has over Martland is key here.  So, too, are times the projected closeness of the race as mentioned.  

Yes, yes, it's an e-mail to supporters meant to drum up enthusiasm....but given the recent attention given to Breslin's lackluster performance as Senator and the jolt of energy it gave Martland's upstart campaign, I wouldn't be surprised if either candidate's internal polling was giving them the message that things are in fact looking very close.

It would explain just why Breslin has spent more on this primary campaign than any campaign he's ever run.  Martland made not of this yet again in the YNN coverage, and he continues to repeat messages like this each day on the campaign trail:

Martland Accuses Incumbent Neil Breslin of Trying to Buy the September 14th primaryTimes Union says Breslin spent $184,449 in July and August

(September 9, 2010, Albany) State Senate candidate Luke Martland today accused 14-year-incumbent Neil Breslin of trying to buy the September 14th primary election by spending $184,449 between July 12 and September 3, 2010. (Times Union)

"Neil Breslin can't run on his record so he is trying to buy the election," said Martland who has campaigned door to door for 90 days to win the primary on September 14th.  

"I don't have a huge campaign war chest funded by insurance companies, lobbyists and special interests," added Martland. "Instead, I have knocked on doors and spoken to voters everywhere in Albany County from Albany to Altamont, from Colonie to Coeymans, from Watervliet to Westerlo and every place in between."

The only thing I have to add to that is that I'm sick to death of adding the link to Breslin's fundraising contributors to remind you that all that money is coming from the likes of AIG, Morgan Stanely, Geicko, Bank of America, and all sorts of other big Wall Stree lobbying firms and political action committees.  That should be old news to anyone who's been paying attention to Breslin for any period of time, and people really need to start looking this stuff up for themselves.  Maybe that will happen eventually...

More recently, these two direct responses to Breslin's recent attempt to distance himself from Senate dysfunction luminaries like Pedro Espada and make claims that he's one of the good guys in the State Senate.  The general Martland theme is Neil Breslin Says One Thing and Does Another:

Neil Breslin says he is a fighter for the people of Albany County -
Wrong!

Breslin voted to increase state taxes by $9 billion in the last two years.

Higher taxes cause suffering for middle class people, seniors and small businesses.

One in four people in Albany live in poverty according to the NYS Community Action Association. (TU March 18, 2010)

Neil Breslin voted to furlough public employees.
Health insurance premiums in Albany County went up nearly 15% in the past year according to the NYS Insurance Dept. (TU March 18, 2010)

Neil Breslin is not a fighter for the people of Albany County. He is a leader of the status quo that raises taxes harming middle class people, seniors and small business. He takes campaign contributions from insurance companies, lobbyists and special interests.

Luke Martland will fight for budget reform, to hold down taxes and state spending, create jobs and put the people of Albany County first.  

::

Neil Breslin says he is a reformer and "has made cleaning up the Senate a top priority."

Wrong!

Neil Breslin opposes term limits for legislators.

Neil Breslin refused to disclose his tax records, law firm client list and salary.

Neil Breslin voted for an ethics bill that would have protected lawyer legislators from revealing their outside income and would have prevented the creation of an independent body to oversee the Legislature.  

Neil Breslin refused to return more than $125,000 in contributions from insurance companies and lobbying firms he accepted in the last 18 months while he was chairman of the Senate Insurance Committee.

If you support the status quo in the state Senate, vote for Neil Breslin.

Luke Martland supports term limits, legislative oversight and full disclosure.

If you want meaningful change, vote for Luke Martland.

These have been appearing daily in my inbox, and I wouldn't be surprised if more were to follow in the final days of the campaign.  Interestingly enough, the main source the Martland campaign is using to prove Breslin is not the squeakly clean champion of the people he claims to be is the local newspaper...

Neil Breslin

Photobucket

"For All The Right Reasons."

...which this week gave Senator Breslin their endorsement for re-election.  The Times Union editorial board on Friday presented what I consider to be one of the worst cases for returning Breslin or any incumbent to office I've ever read.

In fact, I think they've endorsed Breslin for all the wrong reasons.

Judging by the commentary on the TU's own Capitol Confidential blog, I'm clearly not alone in my assessment that this endorsement pandered to a powerful incumbent, ignoring key issues to Martland's detriment and highlighting inconesequential and previously unmentioned minor issues to count towards Breslin's favor.  For crying out loud, one section of the endorsement even makes note that the paper's publish and editor sits one several boards of directors that (surprise!) recieved regular support fromthe Senator.

Read the endorsement for yourself and make up your own mind, of course, but as I read it, I wasn't surprised by the fact that the establishment rag endorsement the establishment bum. It was the weakness of the reasoning behind it that knocked me flat.  I get the impression both reading responses and talking to voters that this is how the endorsement has fallen in the public's eye.

But Breslin is still trying.  In the past few days, the mailer pictured below has been distributed arond Albany County, attempting to make a guy who voted for Pedro Espada for Majority Leader look like a guy who actually stood up to him:

Photobucket

Photobucket

It looks pretty effective to the untrained eye or uneducated voter at first glance.  The fact is that Breslin is appealing to just that kind of thing with this mailer; not only did Breslin have the gavel in his hand during the 2009 Senate Coup that gave Espada the Majority Leader's post, but his was one of many Democratic votes that gave it to him in the first place.  If any Democratic Senator wanted to take a meaningful stand against Espada, that was the time.  Breslin is now one of several Senators statewide, including Espada himself, spending lots of money in their primary re-electionc campaigns trying to convince the public otherwise.

They might buy it, and they might not.  But either way, this is still just the primary.  With the polls opening in just two days, perhaps it's time to wonder a little about the general election.  Smart money still goes to Breslin thanks to his long tenure in office and his family ties to the the County Executive and one of the County Judges, all three of then brothers, but Breslin's electoral fight may not be over after that.  While Albany County is overwhelmingly Democratic, it was a first-term Republican Senator and County Executive that Breslin and his brother suceeded to start their decades-long powerhold here.  In such an anti-incumbent year, and with a noisy Tea Party segment in the Capital Region, I wouldn't be surprised if probably Republican nominee Bob Domenici couldn't present a serious challenge to Breslin after what has become a bruising primary for the Senator.

Indeed, opposition to Breslin from the right and right-of-center has already begun, and they aren't waiting for the general election to target him.  This week's TU Inside Politics columnist sees reporter JOrdan Carleo-Evangelist follow-up on earlier reports that the state-level pro-gun rally has been sending fliers around Albany County encouraging Democrats to vote against Breslin in the primary.

Gun-rights group can't think past primary

The state's biggest gun-rights advocacy group trained its sights on state Sen. Neil Breslin this week, dispatching postcards to its members in Albany County urging them to vote against Breslin in next week's Democratic primary.

The Breslin camp, for its part, wasn't much sweating the ire of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, which accused the 14-year-incumbent of consistently sponsoring and voting for "all gun control measures."

The group's PAC, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Political Victory Fund, paid for the mailing.

Breslin's campaign said the senator is proud of his record on gun control -- and for many Democrats generally, the association's distaste is something of a badge of pride.

And that's where it gets weird.

While the rifle and pistol association was imploring its members to vote "against" Breslin on Sept. 14, the group is not endorsing Breslin's lone Democratic opponent, Luke Martland.

Tom King, the association's executive director, explained the mailing this way: "We're saying that we just don't think that Neil Breslin is the man for the job anymore."

Astute observers (or conspiracy theorists) noted that the group might just be trying to weaken Breslin in hopes that he'll lose the primary to Martland, who would make an easier mark for Republican candidate Bob Domenici.

So we asked whether the NYSRPA would be backing Domenici come November, but King said no decision has yet been made.

Given that Dominici is throwing in his lot with the local Tea Party movement standstill (something that doesn't make any progress can't be called a movement, after all) and that he's touting former military experience (at least I think he is...don't all Tea Party types?) I'm guessing the gun nuts will go his way eventually.  But what's interesting here is, as Carleo-Evangelist's headline points out, they are focusing on Breslin's primary election, not the general.

This speaks to two truths.  First, given Albany County's current thirty-plus point registration advantage for Democrats, winning the primary is essentially rubber stamps a general election victory.  We're certainly not unique in that respect, but toss in the County's history as being the deathbed of the last of the great urban Democratic machines in just the past generation and you get both a boost to that argument and a second angle that better explains this tactic against Breslin.  

See, I make a lot of noise here as a progressive, but I can acknowledge that the Albany County Democratic Party is just that, the Democratic Party.  It's not the Progressive Democratic Party, not at all.  In fact, the party power players have a conservative bent if you ask me, and most others would probably agree it's most firmly grounded in the center.  Such is the nature of self-perpetuating powerful political establishments, but that's beside the point.  It's a Democratic environment where the right-wing Guns, Gods, and Gays arguments could work to the tune of a few thousand votes.  Trust me: you would be amazed at the language I hear come out the mouths of some of the old white dudes in past committee meetings.  Especially during the 2008 presidential campaign.  And this contingent certainly can't use the Gays part of the argument this year...

In any case, the ultimate thing to take away from this is that even if Breslin does walk away with the Democratic nomination, his margin of victory may end up mattering in his fight againt the Republcian nominee.  It will remain an anti-incumbent year, and if Breslin demonstrates weakness in a primary after 14 years as an incumbent, you can probably prepare for continued and increased media coverage as the big story shifts from Martland's to Domenici's outside chance of taking the Senate seat away from Breslin.

Such is the State of the Race just 48 hours from the closing of the polls, and such are the reasons why I'll have pulled the level for Luke Martland by then.  If I can't encourage you to do exactly the same, I at least hope you enjoyed reading and encouraged you to go to the polls this coming Tuesday and vote for somebody, dammit :-)  Stay tuned...it's not over until it's over.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Tip Jar & Cross-Post (0.00 / 0)
Tips for the seventh-inning stretch.

Cross-posted on Soundpolitic.


Living for free! (0.00 / 0)
Do you believe in the one man one vote form of government?

Mr Breslin (as do so many others in the Senate live in the house for free(That would be their Law firm, their sponsor)) well not exactly for free but they have a sponsor and that sponsorship is worth far in excess of what a single contributor could give via the election laws.

If this were college football, the free car (ride) would ban University of Hiscoc & BARCLAY (and others) from the game!

Unlike an unsponsored individual, a candidate that is sponsored always has money in his/her pocket and time to donate to local candidates and civic activities. With this edge they are able to rapidly gain political momentum and before you know it a newcomer such as SD-59, Jim Domagalski of Hiscoc & BARCLAY is upon stepping down from being Erie County Republican Chairman has their endorsement and Walla, Hiscoc & BARCLAY have another NYS Senator, joining Assemblyman William Barclay and SD-46 Neil Breslin.  

Perhaps the only reason there are ONLY 20 attorneys in the NYS Senate is that there just are not enough attorneys willing to step into the political arena!  

This isn't exclusive at all to Hiscock & BARCLAY, current AG candidate Eric Schneiderman has been living under the roof of even larger 1900 Multi-national K & L Gates.

I'm convinced K & L Gates and the Barclay's don't believe in the one man one vote system of government and am voting for Kathleen Rice for AG & Luke Martland SD-46!

Arthur Welser
"Making America #1 in Education"
http://www.arthurwelsercitizen...


reposting (4.00 / 1)
I had asked Jay Jochnowitz 4 questions that I tried to post over at his blog at

http://blog.timesunion.com/opi...

He refused to post them, not to mention to respond to, of course. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....

Are they inflammatory or personal attacks? No. Are they legitimate questions based on what has to be the weirdest endorsement ever written? Yes.

To their credit, capitol confidential did post them (but of course, Mr. Jochnowitz probably feels less personally inclined to respond over there).

So, I repeat.

I have a couple of questions for Jay Jochnowitz.
1. Was there any subtle or not so subtle pressure from anybody to endorse Neil Breslin?
2. To what extent did Hearst have any say in the final decision of whom to endorse?
3. Why was funding of the Arts brought up in this editorial? I have not heard one person claim this to be among the most pressing issues NYS is facing.
4. How come that by far the most defining story of this primary - the Channel 6 story - was not even mentioned in this article?


Very good questions (4.00 / 1)
I made note of very similar issues on the CapCon post.  Never have I read an endorsement that so ignored the biggest issues of the race or was so transparent in its bias.

It would have been nice if Mr. Jochnowitz (TU editorial board member) had used his blog to answer some of these questions, but all we got out of him was a re-post of the endorsement as well.

For the record, below are my own comments from CapCon reposted:

That was the most poorly reasoned editorial I've ever laid eyes on.

First, it mentions several points you like about Martland, then mentions that you disagree with him on the death penalty, something that has not come up in the election at all. Then, you say you disagreed with Breslin's furlough flip-flop, but you give him a benefit of the doubt freebie because "He has had the sometimes unenviable task of having to grapple with what's good for the state and what's good for his constituent."

Awww, poor, poor Senator Man and his grappling with unenviable tasks...Question: Which State Senator doesn't have this problem? Isn't this par for the course? You make it sound like this problem is somehow unique to Senator Breslin, and that is patently ridiculous.

THEN we get this wonderfully specific sentence: "Mr. Breslin has taken progressive stands on key issues." Really? How nice of you describe exactly what issues are so key to your decision. Apparently, support for the arts suddenly became important for the purposes of your endorsement. And you make it sound as if we need Neil to keep those patrongage levels up.

Another question: Are you stupid?? Every legislator in every district makes doubly sure that this kind of stuff is done. Once again, it's par for the course; Martland has given none of us any reason to believe that he wouldn't continue this sort of thing. And by the way, in this year when we've got one of the lates budgets ever after one of the biggest political coups in Senate history....you're talking about keeping our Senator because Breslin supports the local theater district?? Even this artsy-fartsy liberal thinks that's all fluff.

Finally, before endorsing Breslin, you point out that you disagree with him on a "key issue," that of hiding conflicts of interest because of Breslin's unethical stand on client disclosure. Well, if you care about that issue so much, then why'd you give your Senator a pass on it? What make you think that if you endorse him after you said he doesn't support your key issue that he'll ever support it at all?? You've demonstrated bias by showing you are much more prepared to give Sen. Breslin a pass on a key issue versus Luke Martland. He disagrees with you on a key issue and suddenly everything else is forgotten about; Breslin disagrees with you on the biggest issue and you figure you'll lose you box seat at Cap Rep if you focus too much on that. Good. Grief.

It's foolishness. And what's worse is you ignored the biggest story in the campaign this year, probably the one responsible for Martland's shot at winning: You mention NOTHING about how Breslin was caught on camera last month not knowing what was in his own bill that he'd been talking up for months. This should have curbed your enthusiasm a little bit, don't you think? Because it placed an air of dishonesty around everything he's ever done in 14 years.

Think about it: So he's passed some bills. Great. How many of those are just like that prior approval bill he didn't actually know anything about? How many Breslin bills were just written by his staff, passed without him reading it, and then sold to us with words Breslin was told to tell the cameras? The answer is probably most of them, but you ignored this key fact, as well as the key fact that Breslin was the man who was presiding over the Senate during the 2009 coup. That's the straw that broke the camel's back for me: complete omission of facts in a newspaper endorsement is just beyond reproach.

You chose to ignore these crucial facts in your endorsement, and instead highlighted inconsequential tidbits to defend it.

For these reasons, I have to say once again that this was the most poorly reasoned and written newspaper endorsement I've ever read.

Here's hoping it has the same success rate as your endorsement of Tracey Brooks for Congress two years ago...that worked out well for ya!



[ Parent ]
The Albany Project

Please take my Blog Reader Project survey.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


NY blogs

Politics

Adirondack Almanack
Buffalo Geek
Buffalo Pundit
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Daily Politics
DMI Blog
DragonFlyEye
Empire Page
Empire Zone
Gothamist
Gotham Gazette
Group News Blog
Jason Gooljar
Left of the Hudson
Living In Dryden
Lost In The Ozone
McHugh Watch
Nassau GOP Watch
Planet Albany
Politicker NY
Politics on the Hudson
Reform NY
Rochester Turning
Room 8
Simply Left Behind
Take19
The Community Alliance

Think Tanks

Brennan Center for Justice
Citizens Budget Commission
Citizens Union
Drum Major Institute
Fiscal Policy Institute
New Democracy Project
Progressive States

Organizations

Citizen Action
Citizens for Better Government in New York
Common Cause
New York Citizens for Clean Elections
Progressive States Network
>
National Blogs

Politics

AmericaBlog
Crooks and Liars
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
Firedoglake
MyDD
Political Cortex
Senate Guru
Skippy
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Right's Field

LBAN Network

Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Big Head DC
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
BRAD Blog
Brendan Calling
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Calitics
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Cliff Schecter
Comments from Left Field
Confined Space
Corrente
Cotton Mouth
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Gotham
Daily Kos
David Corn
Democrats.com
Dem Bloggers
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Greatscat!
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick!
KnoxViews
Las Vegas Gleaner
Latino Pundit
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Corpse
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raising Kaine
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rox Populi
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Satirical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Turn Maine Blue
Uppity Wisconsin
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

blog radio

Get the albany project in your inbox! Just enter your email address

Delivered by FeedBurner

____________________


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox