We have tomorrow
Bright before us
Like a flame.
Yesterday, a night-gone thing
A sun-down name.
And dawn today
Broad arch above the road we came.
We march!
--From "The New Negro", by Alain Locke
So here's the deal, as it sits today: for a number of years now Titan Cement has been looking to build this great big cement plant near the environmentally sensitive North Carolina coast (part of the site includes 600 acres of "pristine wetlands"), and part of running a cement plant is running cement kilns.
Ya gotta cook limestone, sand, and clay, along with some other ingredients, at very high temperatures (above 2700 degrees F), which sort of fuses everything together; that makes "clinker", which eventually becomes cement, and that's why you need giant kilns and, often, pre-heater towers.
You need fuel for those really hot kilns and towers, and our friends at the Army Corps of Engineers advise that, in the kiln fuel game, you can actually kill two birds with one limestone by burning hazardous waste as a substitute for anywhere from 20% to 50% of your original "fuel of choice" (which is often coal).
According to the Corps, you can burn 12 tons of fuel an hour in one kiln, and that means up to six tons of...
byproducts of pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and electronics manufacturers;
solvents and inks used to print newspaper and other publications;
solvents used to recycle paper;
dry-cleaning solvents;
paint thinners and paint residues;
sludge from the petroleum industry;
used motor oil;
agricultural wastes;
and scrap tires.
...might be going into the mix every hour-and as it turns out, that stuff might contain:
...arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, thallium, and zinc.
Now if you're burning that stuff, it's either going up the smokestack or out the door as a component of the clinker you just made, and if you live anywhere near this plant, you're going to be at least a little concerned...and if you have the impression that the people who are trying to get the permits are running a big ol' hustle to get those permits, you're going to be even more concerned...and it looks like that's what's been going on...and if you put all this together, and you lived in the neighborhood, you might show up at a local County Commissioners' meeting and say something like this...
"From lawsuits for price fixing and court-ordered mine closures of Titan's Florida plant, to allegations of corruption coming from Raleigh, to emails raising suspicion whether Titan was ever even considering any other location, which would make incentives completely unnecessary, the clouds of corruption grow dark as new controversies emerge almost daily."
...or this...
"The bottom line is we know from numerous studies that if we build this thing, more children will get sick, a handful of them will die. We also know from the adult studies that more adults will get sick and quite a few more of them are going to die as well. Which ones? Can't tell you. That makes it difficult, but there will be some."
...which are the two utterances which are today at legal issue. (Ms Darrell is being sued for the first statement, Dr. Hill, the second.)
The reason we are all gathered here today is to figure out whether either of those statements are truthful or not...because if the statements are truthful, they cannot be either slanderous or defamatory.
So let's break it all down, one clause at a time:
Ms. Darrell talked about lawsuits for price fixing, and sure enough, CemWeek ("Global Cement Industry. Knowledge") ran a story in October of '09 entitled "Nine US cement companies accused of price fixing", describing a lawsuit filed for price fixing in which Titan was one of the Defendants.
Court-ordered mine closures? Coffey Burlington, attorneys at law, recount their success with a certain case on their website (Sierra Club v. Army Corps of Engineers, Rinker Group, Tarmac America, Florida Rock Industries, APAC-Florida and Miami-Dade Limestone Products Association), which did in fact result in a court-ordered mine closure of Florida facilities operated by Tarmac America, which is a Titan subsidiary.
Allegations of corruption? How about this, reported in January of 2010 by the Wilmington, NC, StarNews:
A corporation that shares an address and president with a Titan America subsidiary bought a Wilmington office building for more than twice its tax value from Democratic fund-raisers under scrutiny by state and federal prosecutors.
To add to this element of the story, the current Governor, Bev Perdue, has asked the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) to look into Titan's permitting process, which is something that usually follows allegations, if I recall correctly.
Let's move on: the folks in the Wilmington, NC, area have a private economic development committee that has negotiated secretly with Titan for some time; the result of that effort was the decision to provide $4.2 million in local government incentives to Titan.
But here's the thing: if Titan never meant to build anywhere but on that one site, and they still hustled the community for the incentives by using the threat of building somewhere else...well, that's why Ms. Darrell was talking about:
"...emails raising suspicion whether Titan was ever even considering any other location, which would make incentives completely unnecessary..."
In 2008, Keith Barber, he of Wrightsville Beach Magazine, documented Titan's multi-decade interest in this particular location:
Titan has made very little effort to conceal the fact it plans to move forward with construction of a cement plant and limestone mining operation on the banks of the Northeast Cape Fear River. In a 2005 interview with Titan CEO Aris Papadopoulos in Cement Americas magazine, Papadopoulos confirmed the Greece-based company had been considering building a plant in Castle Hayne for nearly two decades...
... In addition, even though the permitting process is 18 months to 2 years out, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Web site reveals that CSX Railroad is already constructing a new spur track at the site of the proposed Carolinas Cement Company.
The Charlotte News & Observer documents the existence of those pesky emails in a January 2010 editorial:
...[Titan lobbyist John] Merritt said he would talk to then-Commerce Secretary Jim Fain. Earlier, he had advised a company spokeswoman on how to respond to questions without raising suspicions that Titan might not qualify for a state grant.
"It is very important that the company not do anything that suggests that this is the only site you are looking at," Merritt e-mailed. And sure enough, in its application for incentives Titan asserted that it was considering sites elsewhere.
Let's jump in for just a second and take a look at where we are:
Ms. Darrell made this statement...
"From lawsuits for price fixing and court-ordered mine closures of Titan's Florida plant, to allegations of corruption coming from Raleigh, to emails raising suspicion whether Titan was ever even considering any other location, which would make incentives completely unnecessary, the clouds of corruption grow dark as new controversies emerge almost daily."
...and based on what we've seen so far, every single word of that statement turns out to be absolutely, provably true:
--There was a price-fixing lawsuit.
--There was a court-ordered mine closure of Titan's Florida plant.
--It's alleged that something funny was going on with that office building, and North Carolina's SBI is investigating.
--We did in fact discover that emails exist raising suspicions as to whether Titan was considering any other location.
--And here we are, talking about one of the new controversies that emerge almost daily.
Today's tale of legal bullying is running pretty long already, and we still have half of the story to go...so let's take a break for today, and we'll pick this up by looking at the statement made by Dr. Hill when we get together next time.
In the meantime, if you're keeping score...I'm thinking that after Round One, it's Defendants, 1, Titan, 0. |
