|
While I enjoy 90% of what I read here, I am baffled by this pages sometimes blind support for Senator Gillenbrand and its reviling of Governor Paterson.
I thought this sight was a progressive one? Lately it seems that if a politician, member of the press, or private citizen disagrees with the TAP party line, they are villified ala Limbaugh and Beck, by ceratin contributing authors.
(Full disclosure: I was called a "fool" by one contributor because I disagreed with their assessment of press coverage for Senator Gillenbrand, a view I thought was legitamite, it may not have been - but a fool?)
TAP's love affair with Kirsten Gillibrand and now its cry for Paterson's head are incongruous with the progressive model.
Why can't someone primary against Gillibrand? Some on TAP thinks that is an absurd (see NY-Sen: Meet Jon Cooper: Still Pondering Run Against Gillibrand ) road to travel - why, someone might challenge the Senator on her inconsistent record?? - party heresy!
The cries for a sitting governor to NOT run more than a year out from the election is also an absurd notion. If he is as terrible as TAP has been saying (unfortunately it seems he is), then isn't a primary the logical place to have an open and honest debate about policy and government, instead of running him out of town with pitch forks and torches?
In both cases, the irrational demands made by some on this page betray the reason the page was created in the first place - intelligent, logical, and reasoned debate to help take back what is rightfully ours.
All viewpoints should be welcome to that debate; only then will progress be reached.
|